These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21110541)

  • 21. Phonemic restoration in sensorineural hearing loss does not depend on baseline speech perception scores.
    Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):EL169-74. PubMed ID: 20968321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The intelligibility of interrupted speech depends upon its uninterrupted intelligibility.
    Ardoint M; Green T; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):EL275-80. PubMed ID: 25324110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Pitch and spectral resolution: A systematic comparison of bottom-up cues for top-down repair of degraded speech.
    Clarke J; Başkent D; Gaudrain E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):395-405. PubMed ID: 26827034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of phase-locking to the temporal envelope of speech in auditory perception and speech intelligibility.
    Millman RE; Johnson SR; Prendergast G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 27(3):533-45. PubMed ID: 25244119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. T'ain't the way you say it, it's what you say--perceptual continuity of voice and top-down restoration of speech.
    Clarke J; Gaudrain E; Chatterjee M; Başkent D
    Hear Res; 2014 Sep; 315():80-7. PubMed ID: 25019356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distorting temporal fine structure by phase shifting and its effects on speech intelligibility and neural phase locking.
    Xu Y; Chen M; LaFaire P; Tan X; Richter CP
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):13387. PubMed ID: 29042580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Temporal jitter disrupts speech intelligibility: a simulation of auditory aging.
    Pichora-Fuller MK; Schneider BA; Macdonald E; Pass HE; Brown S
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):114-21. PubMed ID: 17157462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spectral and temporal cues for phoneme recognition in noise.
    Xu L; Zheng Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1758. PubMed ID: 17927435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A glimpsing account of the role of temporal fine structure information in speech recognition.
    Apoux F; Healy EW
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():119-26. PubMed ID: 23716216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Spectro-temporal envelope changes caused by temporal fine structure modification.
    Kates JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3981-90. PubMed ID: 21682419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Relative contribution to speech intelligibility of different envelope modulation rates within the speech dynamic range.
    Stone MA; Füllgrabe C; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2127-37. PubMed ID: 20968383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Transient and sustained cortical activity elicited by connected speech of varying intelligibility.
    Tiitinen H; Miettinen I; Alku P; May PJ
    BMC Neurosci; 2012 Dec; 13():157. PubMed ID: 23276297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The dynamic range of useful temporal fine structure cues for speech in the presence of a competing talker.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Füllgrabe C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2162-72. PubMed ID: 21973370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modelling speech intelligibility in adverse conditions.
    Jørgensen S; Dau T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():343-51. PubMed ID: 23716240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Rhebergen KS; Lyzenga J; Dreschler WA; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of different noise types on the speech and non-speech elicited mismatch negativity.
    Kozou H; Kujala T; Shtyrov Y; Toppila E; Starck J; Alku P; Näätänen R
    Hear Res; 2005 Jan; 199(1-2):31-9. PubMed ID: 15574298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of spectral smearing and temporal fine structure degradation on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Péan V; Meyer B; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):4023-33. PubMed ID: 19507983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Critical bandwidth speech: Arrays of subcritical band speech maintain near-ceiling intelligibility at high amplitudes.
    Warren RM; Bashford JA; Lenz PW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL222. PubMed ID: 28372079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of temporal modulation rate on the intelligibility of phase-based speech.
    Chen F; Guan T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Dec; 134(6):EL520. PubMed ID: 25669298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners.
    Litvak LM; Spahr AJ; Saoji AA; Fridman GY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):982-91. PubMed ID: 17672646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.