These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21112128)

  • 1. Prediction of drug intestinal absorption by new linear and non-linear QSPR.
    Talevi A; Goodarzi M; Ortiz EV; Duchowicz PR; Bellera CL; Pesce G; Castro EA; Bruno-Blanch LE
    Eur J Med Chem; 2011 Jan; 46(1):218-28. PubMed ID: 21112128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New QSPR study for the prediction of aqueous solubility of drug-like compounds.
    Duchowicz PR; Talevi A; Bruno-Blanch LE; Castro EA
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2008 Sep; 16(17):7944-55. PubMed ID: 18701302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of k-nearest-neighbor QSPR models of metabolic stability of drug candidates.
    Shen M; Xiao Y; Golbraikh A; Gombar VK; Tropsha A
    J Med Chem; 2003 Jul; 46(14):3013-20. PubMed ID: 12825940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ADME evaluation in drug discovery. 8. The prediction of human intestinal absorption by a support vector machine.
    Hou T; Wang J; Li Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(6):2408-15. PubMed ID: 17929911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In silico ADME modelling 2: computational models to predict human serum albumin binding affinity using ant colony systems.
    Gunturi SB; Narayanan R; Khandelwal A
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2006 Jun; 14(12):4118-29. PubMed ID: 16504519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computational prediction of oral drug absorption based on absorption rate constants in humans.
    Linnankoski J; Mäkelä JM; Ranta VP; Urtti A; Yliperttula M
    J Med Chem; 2006 Jun; 49(12):3674-81. PubMed ID: 16759110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A new method for quantitative assessment of mechanisms of partitioning and absorption of drugs: linear solvation energy relationships].
    Li J; Sun J; He ZG
    Yao Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Jan; 42(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 17520801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In silico ADME modelling: prediction models for blood-brain barrier permeation using a systematic variable selection method.
    Narayanan R; Gunturi SB
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 13(8):3017-28. PubMed ID: 15781411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction and mechanistic interpretation of human oral drug absorption using MI-QSAR analysis.
    Iyer M; Tseng YJ; Senese CL; Liu J; Hopfinger AJ
    Mol Pharm; 2007; 4(2):218-31. PubMed ID: 17397237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Skin permeation rate as a function of chemical structure.
    Katritzky AR; Dobchev DA; Fara DC; Hür E; Tämm K; Kurunczi L; Karelson M; Varnek A; Solov'ev VP
    J Med Chem; 2006 Jun; 49(11):3305-14. PubMed ID: 16722649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of the potential of linear and nonlinear skin permeation models for the prediction of experimentally measured percutaneous drug absorption.
    Brown MB; Lau CH; Lim ST; Sun Y; Davey N; Moss GP; Yoo SH; De Muynck C
    J Pharm Pharmacol; 2012 Apr; 64(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 22420662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ADME evaluation in drug discovery. 1. Applications of genetic algorithms to the prediction of blood-brain partitioning of a large set of drugs.
    Hou T; Xu X
    J Mol Model; 2002 Dec; 8(12):337-49. PubMed ID: 12541001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new topological descriptors based model for predicting intestinal epithelial transport of drugs in Caco-2 cell culture.
    Marrero Ponce Y; Cabrera Pérez MA; Romero Zaldivar V; González Díaz H; Torrens F
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 2004 Jun; 7(2):186-99. PubMed ID: 15367375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In silico prediction of membrane permeability from calculated molecular parameters.
    Refsgaard HH; Jensen BF; Brockhoff PB; Padkjaer SB; Guldbrandt M; Christensen MS
    J Med Chem; 2005 Feb; 48(3):805-11. PubMed ID: 15689164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benchmarking of linear and nonlinear approaches for quantitative structure-property relationship studies of metal complexation with ionophores.
    Tetko IV; Solov'ev VP; Antonov AV; Yao X; Doucet JP; Fan B; Hoonakker F; Fourches D; Jost P; Lachiche N; Varnek A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):808-19. PubMed ID: 16563012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive QSPR study of the dissociation constants of diverse pharmaceutical compounds.
    Mercader AG; Goodarzi M; Duchowicz PR; Fernández FM; Castro EA
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2010 Nov; 76(5):433-40. PubMed ID: 20925694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hologram QSAR model for the prediction of human oral bioavailability.
    Moda TL; Montanari CA; Andricopulo AD
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 15(24):7738-45. PubMed ID: 17870541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. QSAR and ADME.
    Hansch C; Leo A; Mekapati SB; Kurup A
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 12(12):3391-400. PubMed ID: 15158808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of aqueous solubility of a diverse set of compounds using quantitative structure-property relationships.
    Cheng A; Merz KM
    J Med Chem; 2003 Aug; 46(17):3572-80. PubMed ID: 12904062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimation of ADME properties with substructure pattern recognition.
    Shen J; Cheng F; Xu Y; Li W; Tang Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1034-41. PubMed ID: 20578727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.