BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21113757)

  • 1. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for volume-rendered computed tomography portovenography: improvement of image quality.
    Matsuda I; Hanaoka S; Akahane M; Sato J; Komatsu S; Inoh S; Kiryu S; Yoshioka N; Ino K; Ohtomo K
    Jpn J Radiol; 2010 Nov; 28(9):700-6. PubMed ID: 21113757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
    Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
    Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Renovascular CT: comparison between adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction.
    Noda Y; Goshima S; Koyasu H; Shigeyama S; Miyoshi T; Kawada H; Kawai N; Matsuo M
    Clin Radiol; 2017 Oct; 72(10):901.e13-901.e19. PubMed ID: 28673448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical value of dual-energy spectral imaging with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for reducing contrast medium dose in CT portal venography: in comparison with standard 120-kVp imaging protocol.
    Ma CL; Chen XX; Lei YX; Zhang XR; Jia YJ; Tian X; Tian Q
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20151022. PubMed ID: 27031376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abdominal CT: an intra-individual comparison between virtual monochromatic spectral and polychromatic 120-kVp images obtained during the same examination.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1715-22. PubMed ID: 25015416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Detection of Focal Liver Lesions Using Abdominal CT: A Comparison of Image Quality Between Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction V and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction.
    Lee S; Kwon H; Cho J
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Dec; 23(12):1532-1538. PubMed ID: 27745816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study of using a deep learning image reconstruction to improve the image quality of extremely low-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for patients with hepatic lesions.
    Cao L; Liu X; Li J; Qu T; Chen L; Cheng Y; Hu J; Sun J; Guo J
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201086. PubMed ID: 33242256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience.
    Marin D; Nelson RC; Schindera ST; Richard S; Youngblood RS; Yoshizumi TT; Samei E
    Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 20032149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
    Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
    Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Gilman MD; Hsieh J; Pien HH; Digumarthy SR; Shepard JA
    Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):565-73. PubMed ID: 21386048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study.
    Deák Z; Grimm JM; Treitl M; Geyer LL; Linsenmaier U; Körner M; Reiser MF; Wirth S
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):197-206. PubMed ID: 23169793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation dose reduction at multidetector CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for evaluation of urolithiasis: how low can we go?
    Kulkarni NM; Uppot RN; Eisner BH; Sahani DV
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):158-66. PubMed ID: 22891359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction reduce both the radiation dose and the amount of iodine contrast medium in a dynamic CT study of the liver?
    Takahashi H; Okada M; Hyodo T; Hidaka S; Kagawa Y; Matsuki M; Tsurusaki M; Murakami T
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Apr; 83(4):684-91. PubMed ID: 24418284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Upgrade to iterative image reconstruction (IR) in MDCT imaging: a clinical study for detailed parameter optimization beyond vendor recommendations using the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction environment (ASIR) Part2: The chest.
    Mueck FG; Michael L; Deak Z; Scherr MK; Maxien D; Geyer LL; Reiser M; Wirth S
    Rofo; 2013 Jul; 185(7):644-54. PubMed ID: 23696019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model-based iterative reconstruction compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and filtered back-projection in CT of the kidneys and the adjacent retroperitoneum.
    Olcott EW; Shin LK; Sommer G; Chan I; Rosenberg J; Molvin FL; Boas FE; Fleischmann D
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):774-84. PubMed ID: 24809318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Iterative reconstruction: comparison of techniques for reduced-dose liver computed tomography following transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Cha MJ; Jeong WK; Choi D; Kim YK; Lim S; Choi SY; Lee WJ
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Dec; 57(12):1429-1437. PubMed ID: 26792822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CT of the pancreas: comparison of image quality and pancreatic duct depiction among model-based iterative, adaptive statistical iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Lin XZ; Machida H; Tanaka I; Fukui R; Ueno E; Chen KM; Yan FH
    Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):497-505. PubMed ID: 24496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.