These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

622 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21113857)

  • 21. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X; Chen Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Grasp cueing shows obligatory attention to action goals.
    Fischer MH; Prinz J; Lotz K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Jun; 61(6):860-8. PubMed ID: 18470817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Action modulates object-based selection.
    Linnell KJ; Humphreys GW; McIntyre DB; Laitinen S; Wing AM
    Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(17):2268-86. PubMed ID: 15924941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Two (or three) is one too many: testing the flexibility of contextual cueing with multiple target locations.
    Zellin M; Conci M; von Mühlenen A; Müller HJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2065-76. PubMed ID: 21755420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How does attention spread across objects oriented in depth?
    Reppa I; Fougnie D; Schmidt WC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):912-25. PubMed ID: 20436189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A functional MRI study of preparatory signals for spatial location and objects.
    Corbetta M; Tansy AP; Stanley CM; Astafiev SV; Snyder AZ; Shulman GL
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2041-56. PubMed ID: 16243051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: the effect of perceptual difficulty.
    Prinzmetal W; Zvinyatskovskiy A; Gutierrez P; Dilem L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):352-69. PubMed ID: 18609402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The automaticity of vantage point shifts within a synaesthetes' spatial calendar.
    Jarick M; Jensen C; Dixon MJ; Smilek D
    J Neuropsychol; 2011 Sep; 5(2):333-52. PubMed ID: 21923793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dimension-based working memory-driven capture of visual selection.
    Pan Y; Xu B; Soto D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1123-31. PubMed ID: 19142832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of attention in the occurrence of the affordance effect.
    Riggio L; Iani C; Gherri E; Benatti F; Rubichi S; Nicoletti R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):449-58. PubMed ID: 17905141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Action relations facilitate the identification of briefly-presented objects.
    Roberts KL; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):597-612. PubMed ID: 21264722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The time course of attentional capture under dual-task conditions.
    Santangelo V; Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 21258904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is contextual cueing more than the guidance of visual-spatial attention?
    Schankin A; Hagemann D; Schubö A
    Biol Psychol; 2011 Apr; 87(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 21315794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neural mechanisms of attentional shifts due to irrelevant spatial and numerical cues.
    Ranzini M; Dehaene S; Piazza M; Hubbard EM
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Oct; 47(12):2615-24. PubMed ID: 19465038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attentional orienting and awareness: evidence from a discrimination task.
    López-Ramón MF; Chica AB; Bartolomeo P; Lupiáñez J
    Conscious Cogn; 2011 Sep; 20(3):745-55. PubMed ID: 21353598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.
    Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Individual differences in spatial mental imagery.
    Borst G; Kosslyn SM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):2031-50. PubMed ID: 20521213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task.
    Doricchi F; Macci E; Silvetti M; Macaluso E
    Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul; 20(7):1574-85. PubMed ID: 19846472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Right temporal-parietal junction engagement during spatial reorienting does not depend on strategic attention control.
    Natale E; Marzi CA; Macaluso E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Mar; 48(4):1160-4. PubMed ID: 19932706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.