These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

622 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21113857)

  • 41. Attention to baseline: does orienting visuospatial attention really facilitate target detection?
    Albares M; Criaud M; Wardak C; Nguyen SC; Ben Hamed S; Boulinguez P
    J Neurophysiol; 2011 Aug; 106(2):809-16. PubMed ID: 21613585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Tracking the time course of action priming on object recognition: evidence for fast and slow influences of action on perception.
    Kiefer M; Sim EJ; Helbig H; Graf M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 23(8):1864-74. PubMed ID: 20617882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Investigating the role of response in spatial context learning.
    Makovski T; Jiang YV
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1563-79. PubMed ID: 21480078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. How do selected arrows guide visuospatial attention? Dissociating symbolic value and spatial proximity.
    Leblanc E; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1314-20. PubMed ID: 20873940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A demonstration of direct access to colored stimuli following cueing by color.
    Navon D; Kasten R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 21621179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Inhibition of return exaggerates change blindness.
    Smith DT; Schenk T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Nov; 63(11):2231-8. PubMed ID: 20336583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection.
    Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Martella D; Casagrande M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21688940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Automatic selective attention as a function of sensory modality in aging.
    Guerreiro MJ; Adam JJ; Van Gerven PW
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Mar; 67(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 21798856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accelerated time-course of inhibition of return in Huntington's disease.
    Fielding J; Georgiou-Karistianis N; Bradshaw J; Millist L; Churchyard A; White O
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 166(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 16153717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Adults with dyslexia can use cues to orient and constrain attention but have a smaller and weaker attention spotlight.
    Moores E; Tsouknida E; Romani C
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):55-65. PubMed ID: 25872179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An examination of the nature of attentional deficits in patients with Parkinson's disease: evidence from a spatial orienting task.
    Filoteo JV; Delis DC; Salmon DP; Demadura T; Roman MJ; Shults CW
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 1997 Jul; 3(4):337-47. PubMed ID: 9260443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Involuntary but not voluntary orienting contributes to a disengage deficit in visual neglect.
    Olk B; Hildebrandt H; Kingstone A
    Cortex; 2010 Oct; 46(9):1149-64. PubMed ID: 19733346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Exogenous and endogenous spatial attention effects on visuospatial working memory.
    Botta F; Santangelo V; Raffone A; Lupiáñez J; Belardinelli MO
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1590-602. PubMed ID: 20112160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Deficit of endogenous spatial orienting of attention in children with benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (BECTS).
    Deltour L; Querné L; Vernier-Hauvette MP; Berquin P
    Epilepsy Res; 2008 May; 79(2-3):112-9. PubMed ID: 18329247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Grasping the other's attention: the role of animacy in action cueing of joint attention.
    Lindemann O; Nuku P; Rueschemeyer SA; Bekkering H
    Vision Res; 2011 Apr; 51(8):940-4. PubMed ID: 21215275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Spatial working memory and contextual cueing in patients with Korsakoff amnesia.
    van Asselen M; Kessels RP; Wester AJ; Postma A
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 Aug; 27(6):645-55. PubMed ID: 16019641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Temporal variation in the control of goal-directed visuospatial attention in basal ganglia disorders.
    Fielding J; Georgiou-Karistianis N; Millist L; White O
    Neurosci Res; 2006 Jan; 54(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 16290237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The orienting of visuospatial attention: an event-related brain potential study.
    Talsma D; Slagter HA; Nieuwenhuis S; Hage J; Kok A
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):117-29. PubMed ID: 15925498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.