These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

640 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21113864)

  • 1. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Now you see it, now you don't: controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions eliminates the Gratton effect.
    Schmidt JR; De Houwer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):176-86. PubMed ID: 21745649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Context specificity of conflict frequency-dependent control.
    Vietze I; Wendt M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1391-400. PubMed ID: 19048452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is "conflict adaptation" driven by conflict? Behavioral and EEG evidence for the underappreciated role of congruent trials.
    Compton RJ; Huber E; Levinson AR; Zheutlin A
    Psychophysiology; 2012 May; 49(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 22332754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional control of task and response in lateral and medial frontal cortex: brain activity and reaction time distributions.
    Aarts E; Roelofs A; van Turennout M
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Aug; 47(10):2089-99. PubMed ID: 19467359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):579-92. PubMed ID: 22390293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conflict adaptation and cognitive control adjustments following traumatic brain injury.
    Larson MJ; Kaufman DA; Perlstein WM
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2009 Nov; 15(6):927-37. PubMed ID: 19765356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional control in anterior cingulate cortex based on probabilistic cueing.
    Aarts E; Roelofs A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):716-27. PubMed ID: 20146601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.
    Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 21517220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Control adjustments in speaking: Electrophysiology of the Gratton effect in picture naming.
    Shitova N; Roelofs A; Schriefers H; Bastiaansen M; Schoffelen JM
    Cortex; 2017 Jul; 92():289-303. PubMed ID: 28549279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 21936655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect.
    Goldfarb L; Henik A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1170-6. PubMed ID: 17924815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory.
    Clayson PE; Larson MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1953-61. PubMed ID: 21435347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stimulus ambiguity elicits response conflict.
    Szmalec A; Verbruggen F; Vandierendonck A; De Baene W; Verguts T; Notebaert W
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 18329807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ERP investigation of the Stroop task: the role of the cingulate in attentional allocation and conflict resolution.
    Badzakova-Trajkov G; Barnett KJ; Waldie KE; Kirk IJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1253():139-48. PubMed ID: 19084509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The regulation of cognitive control following rostral anterior cingulate cortex lesion in humans.
    di Pellegrino G; Ciaramelli E; Làdavas E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Feb; 19(2):275-86. PubMed ID: 17280516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalizing attentional control across dimensions and tasks: evidence from transfer of proportion-congruent effects.
    Wühr P; Duthoo W; Notebaert W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(4):779-801. PubMed ID: 25380403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contextual adjustments in cognitive control across tasks.
    Freitas AL; Bahar M; Yang S; Banai R
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Dec; 18(12):1040-3. PubMed ID: 18031409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sustained vs. transient cognitive control: evidence of a behavioral dissociation.
    Funes MJ; Lupiáñez J; Humphreys G
    Cognition; 2010 Mar; 114(3):338-47. PubMed ID: 19962136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.