688 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21114756)
1. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process.
Peternelj-Taylor C
J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Calling all presenters.
Peternelj-Taylor C
J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(3):107-9. PubMed ID: 21175530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Consider the source.
Mason DJ
Am J Nurs; 2009 Apr; 109(4):7. PubMed ID: 19325281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection].
Clarke SP
Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Responding to peer reviews: pointers that authors don't learn in school.
Algase DL
Res Theory Nurs Pract; 2008; 22(4):219-21. PubMed ID: 19093658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hitting the bull's eye rather than shooting yourself between the eyes.
Froman RD
Res Nurs Health; 2008 Oct; 31(5):399-401. PubMed ID: 18613067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How to get published in an international journal.
Fahy K
Women Birth; 2010 Jun; 23(2):43-4. PubMed ID: 20434718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nurse editors' views on the peer review process.
Kearney MH; Freda MC
Res Nurs Health; 2005 Dec; 28(6):444-52. PubMed ID: 16287058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review.
Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 20637926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Someone asked for a "how-to" write editorial.
Marrelli TM
Home Healthc Nurse; 2010 Mar; 28(3):133-4. PubMed ID: 20308806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Format, style, and precision.
Froman RD
Res Nurs Health; 2011 Feb; 34(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 21243654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Publishing in English-language journals.
Davis AJ; Tschudin V
Nurs Ethics; 2007 May; 14(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 17459824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals.
Baggs JG; Broome ME; Dougherty MC; Freda MC; Kearney MH
J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 18764847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal.
Downer M
Community Dent Health; 2003 Mar; 20(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 12688596
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Writing a feature article: not all articles are alike.
Pelletier LR
Nurse Author Ed; 2003; 13(4):7-8. PubMed ID: 14562512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Peer review and the nursing literature.
Dougherty MC
Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):73. PubMed ID: 19289927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Working double-blind.
Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7179):605-6. PubMed ID: 18256621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Blind peer review: tips for authors, reviewers, and editors.
Flanagin A
Nurse Author Ed; 1994; 4(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 7849791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reviewers support blinding in peer review.
Tierney AJ
J Adv Nurs; 2008 Oct; 64(2):113. PubMed ID: 18990091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reviewing peer review: the three reviewers you meet at submission time.
Clarke SP
Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Dec; 38(4):5-9. PubMed ID: 17342873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
