These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2111525)
1. The impact of prospective payment on the economics, ethics, and quality of nursing. Smeltzer CH Nurs Adm Q; 1990; 14(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 2111525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnet hospitals talk about the impact of DRGs on nursing care--Part I. Kramer M; Schmalenberg C Nurs Manage; 1987 Sep; 18(9):38-42. PubMed ID: 3114688 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective payment: focus on quality of care. Hegyvary ST ANA Publ; 1984 Apr; (G-164):51-61. PubMed ID: 6428257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective payment (DRGs): what will be the impact on cancer care? Yasko JM; Fleck A Oncol Nurs Forum; 1984; 11(3):63-72. PubMed ID: 6425810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Strategic planning: nursing practice in the PPS. Porter-O'Grady T Nurs Manage; 1985 Oct; 16(10):53-6. PubMed ID: 3934606 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost containment, DRGs, and the ethics of health care. Ethical perspectives on prospective payment. Dougherty CJ Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 2497082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nursing and DRGs: proactive responses to prospective reimbursement. Hamilton JM Nurs Health Care; 1984 Mar; 5(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 6424065 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The federal role in changing health care financing. Part II: prospective payment and its impact on nursing. Davis CK Nurs Econ; 1983; 1(2):98-104, 146. PubMed ID: 6415496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Acuity and staffing under prospective payment. Adams R; Johnson B J Nurs Adm; 1986 Oct; 16(10):21-5. PubMed ID: 3093644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gauging nursing intensity to bring costs to light. Prescott PA; Phillips CY Nurs Health Care; 1988 Jan; 9(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 3336470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ProPAC's assessment of DRGs and nursing intensity. Price KF; Lake ET Nurs Econ; 1988; 6(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 3126402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Tying nurse quality to payment. CMS may link reporting on RN indicators to hikes. Evans M Mod Healthc; 2008 Feb; 38(7):10. PubMed ID: 18389815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Keep an eye on nursing care in the skilled nursing facilities. Mohler MM Director; 2000; 8(1):34-5. PubMed ID: 11081022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective payment systems and their implications for nursing. Simons D Prairie Rose; 1986; 55(2):5. PubMed ID: 3636926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Paying hospitals on the basis of nursing intensity: policy and political considerations. Ginsburg PB Policy Polit Nurs Pract; 2008 May; 9(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 18650416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evolution of the prospective payment system: implications for nursing. Jones KR Nurs Econ; 1989; 7(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 2685613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]