778 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21115376)
21. A qualitative and quantitative assessment of simultaneous strain, shear wave, and point shear wave elastography to distinguish malignant and benign breast lesions.
Altıntas Y; Bayrak M; Alabaz Ö; Celiktas M
Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1155-1162. PubMed ID: 33070635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Implementation of Elastography Score and Strain Ratio in Combination with B-Mode Ultrasound Avoids Unnecessary Biopsies of Breast Lesions.
Bojanic K; Katavic N; Smolic M; Peric M; Kralik K; Sikora M; Vidačić K; Pacovski M; Stimac D; Ivanac G
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):804-816. PubMed ID: 28094066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography.
Thomas A; Degenhardt F; Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Slowinski T; Fischer T
Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):558-63. PubMed ID: 20171905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Simultaneous comparison between strain and shear wave elastography of breast masses for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions by qualitative and quantitative assessments.
Fujioka T; Mori M; Kubota K; Kikuchi Y; Katsuta L; Kasahara M; Oda G; Ishiba T; Nakagawa T; Tateishi U
Breast Cancer; 2019 Nov; 26(6):792-798. PubMed ID: 31175605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions.
Alhabshi SM; Rahmat K; Abdul Halim N; Aziz S; Radhika S; Gan GC; Vijayananthan A; Westerhout CJ; Mohd-Shah MN; Jaszle S; Harlina Mohd Latar N; Muhammad R
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):568-78. PubMed ID: 23384468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Diagnosis of solid breast lesions by elastography 5-point score and strain ratio method.
Zhao QL; Ruan LT; Zhang H; Yin YM; Duan SX
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3245-9. PubMed ID: 22749109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic performances of shear-wave elastography and B-mode ultrasound to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions: the emphasis on the cutoff value of qualitative and quantitative parameters.
Song EJ; Sohn YM; Seo M
Clin Imaging; 2018; 50():302-307. PubMed ID: 29751202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Added value of shear-wave elastography for evaluation of breast masses detected with screening US imaging.
Lee SH; Chang JM; Kim WH; Bae MS; Seo M; Koo HR; Chu AJ; Gweon HM; Cho N; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Oct; 273(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 24955927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Shear Wave Elastography for Surgically Verified Breast Papillary Lesions: Is It Effective for Differentiation Between Benign and Malignant Lesions?
Choi HJ; Ko KH; Jung HK
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Oct; 36(10):2007-2014. PubMed ID: 28708299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. B-Mode Ultrasound Combined with Color Doppler and Strain Elastography in the Diagnosis of Non-mass Breast Lesions: A Prospective Study.
Li L; Zhou X; Zhao X; Hao S; Yao J; Zhong W; Zhi H
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2582-2590. PubMed ID: 28844465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging.
Satake H; Nishio A; Ikeda M; Ishigaki S; Shimamoto K; Hirano M; Naganawa S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):202-9. PubMed ID: 21178068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions.
Kokubu Y; Yamada K; Tanabe M; Izumori A; Kato C; Horii R; Ohno S; Matsueda K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 33389371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Elastography for breast cancer diagnosis: a useful tool for small and BI-RADS 4 lesions.
Liu XJ; Zhu Y; Liu PF; Xu YL
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(24):10739-43. PubMed ID: 25605168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography of the breast according to scanning orientation.
Kim S; Choi S; Choi Y; Kook SH; Park HJ; Chung EC
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Oct; 33(10):1797-804. PubMed ID: 25253826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Role of elastography in the assessment of breast lesions: preliminary results.
Navarro B; Ubeda B; Vallespí M; Wolf C; Casas L; Browne JL
J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Mar; 30(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 21357553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses.
Cho N; Moon WK; Kim HY; Chang JM; Park SH; Lyou CY
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20040770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical application of qualitative assessment for breast masses in shear-wave elastography.
Gweon HM; Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e680-5. PubMed ID: 23988689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic Performance of Multimodal Sound Touch Elastography for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.
Dong F; Wu H; Zhang L; Tian H; Liang W; Ye X; Liu Y; Xu J
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Aug; 38(8):2181-2190. PubMed ID: 30593673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant cervical lesions.
Lu R; Xiao Y; Liu M; Shi D
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Apr; 33(4):667-71. PubMed ID: 24658946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis.
Itoh A; Ueno E; Tohno E; Kamma H; Takahashi H; Shiina T; Yamakawa M; Matsumura T
Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):341-50. PubMed ID: 16484352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
