180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21115654)
1. The positive correlation between dN/dS and dS in mammals is due to runs of adjacent substitutions.
Stoletzki N; Eyre-Walker A
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Apr; 28(4):1371-80. PubMed ID: 21115654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lineage-specific variation in intensity of natural selection in mammals.
Toll-Riera M; Laurie S; Albà MM
Mol Biol Evol; 2011 Jan; 28(1):383-98. PubMed ID: 20688808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatial covariation of mutation and nonsynonymous substitution rates in vertebrate mitochondrial genomes.
Broughton RE; Reneau PC
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Aug; 23(8):1516-24. PubMed ID: 16705079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The roles of positive and negative selection in the molecular evolution of insect endosymbionts.
Fry AJ; Wernegreen JJ
Gene; 2005 Aug; 355():1-10. PubMed ID: 16039807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Synonymous substitutions substantially improve evolutionary inference from highly diverged proteins.
Seo TK; Kishino H
Syst Biol; 2008 Jun; 57(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 18570032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computing Ka and Ks with a consideration of unequal transitional substitutions.
Zhang Z; Li J; Yu J
BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Jun; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16740169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A genetic algorithm approach to detecting lineage-specific variation in selection pressure.
Pond SL; Frost SD
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):478-85. PubMed ID: 15509724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interaction between selection and biased gene conversion in mammalian protein-coding sequence evolution revealed by a phylogenetic covariance analysis.
Lartillot N
Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Feb; 30(2):356-68. PubMed ID: 23024185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patterns of evolutionary selection pressure in the immune signaling protein TRAF3IP2 in mammals.
Wu B; Gong J; Yuan S; Zhang Y; Wei T
Gene; 2013 Dec; 531(2):403-10. PubMed ID: 24021976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positive selection at sites of multiple amino acid replacements since rat-mouse divergence.
Bazykin GA; Kondrashov FA; Ogurtsov AY; Sunyaev S; Kondrashov AS
Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):558-62. PubMed ID: 15175752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The molecular clock revisited: the rate of synonymous vs. replacement change in Drosophila.
Zeng LW; Comeron JM; Chen B; Kreitman M
Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):369-82. PubMed ID: 9720289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variation in positive selection in termite GNBPs and Relish.
Bulmer MS; Crozier RH
Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Feb; 23(2):317-26. PubMed ID: 16221893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adaptive evolution after duplication of penaeidin antimicrobial peptides.
Padhi A; Verghese B; Otta SK; Varghese B; Ramu K
Fish Shellfish Immunol; 2007 Sep; 23(3):553-66. PubMed ID: 17449277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlated Selection on Amino Acid Deletion and Replacement in Mammalian Protein Sequences.
Zheng Y; Graur D; Azevedo RBR
J Mol Evol; 2018 Jul; 86(6):365-378. PubMed ID: 29955898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Convergent evolution of marine mammals is associated with distinct substitutions in common genes.
Zhou X; Seim I; Gladyshev VN
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16550. PubMed ID: 26549748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detecting positive and purifying selection at synonymous sites in yeast and worm.
Zhou T; Gu W; Wilke CO
Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Aug; 27(8):1912-22. PubMed ID: 20231333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Site-to-site variation of synonymous substitution rates.
Pond SK; Muse SV
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec; 22(12):2375-85. PubMed ID: 16107593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Large-scale analyses of synonymous substitution rates can be sensitive to assumptions about the process of mutation.
Aris-Brosou S; Bielawski JP
Gene; 2006 Aug; 378():58-64. PubMed ID: 16797879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The nonsynonymous/synonymous substitution rate ratio versus the radical/conservative replacement rate ratio in the evolution of mammalian genes.
Hanada K; Shiu SH; Li WH
Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Oct; 24(10):2235-41. PubMed ID: 17652332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence of diversifying selection in human papillomavirus type 16 E6 but not E7 oncogenes.
DeFilippis VR; Ayala FJ; Villarreal LP
J Mol Evol; 2002 Oct; 55(4):491-9. PubMed ID: 12355268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
