These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21116105)

  • 1. Radical perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy after previous prostate surgery: surgical and functional outcomes.
    Imperatore V; Cantiello F; Fusco F; Iannuzzo M; Di Meo S; Imbimbo C; Mirone V
    Urol Int; 2011; 86(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 21116105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radical prostatectomy after previous prostate surgery: clinical and functional outcomes.
    Colombo R; Naspro R; Salonia A; Montorsi F; Raber M; Suardi N; Saccà A; Rigatti P
    J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2459-63; discussion 2463. PubMed ID: 17085129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy gives favourable surgical and functional outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate.
    Palisaar JR; Wenske S; Sommerer F; Hinkel A; Noldus J
    BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 19298408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Stool behaviour and local pain after radical perineal and retroperitoneal prostatectomy].
    Mirzapour K; de Geeter P; Löhmer H; Albers P
    Aktuelle Urol; 2011 Nov; 42(6):368-73. PubMed ID: 22090372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retropubic versus perineal radical prostatectomy in early prostate cancer: eight-year experience.
    Martis G; Diana M; Ombres M; Cardi A; Mastrangeli R; Mastrangeli B
    J Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 95(6):513-8. PubMed ID: 17226809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radical retropubic vs. radical perineal prostatectomy: a comparison of relative benefits in four urban hospitals.
    May M; Dorst M; May J; Hoschke B; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Siegsmund M
    Urol Nurs; 2007 Dec; 27(6):519-26. PubMed ID: 18217535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
    Albers P; Schäfers S; Löhmer H; de Geeter P
    BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer.
    Damber JE; Khatami A
    Acta Oncol; 2005; 44(6):599-604. PubMed ID: 16165919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting erectile function after radical retropubic prostatectomy: results from 1620 consecutive patients.
    Ayyathurai R; Manoharan M; Nieder AM; Kava B; Soloway MS
    BJU Int; 2008 Apr; 101(7):833-6. PubMed ID: 18190627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A single-institution comparison between radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy on perioperative and pathological outcomes for obese men: an analysis of the Duke Prostate Center database.
    Fitzsimons NJ; Sun LL; Dahm P; Moul JW; Madden J; Gan TJ; Freedland SJ
    Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1146-51. PubMed ID: 18158036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.
    Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Dowell JM; Auge BK; Paulson DF; Dahm P
    Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 15072893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
    J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Long-term results of retropubic radical prostatectomy].
    Petrov SB; Rakul SA; Galimov RD
    Vestn Khir Im I I Grek; 2010; 169(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 20387620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
    Prasad SM; Gu X; Lavelle R; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
    J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 21074198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contemporary appraisal of radical perineal prostatectomy.
    Janoff DM; Parra RO
    J Urol; 2005 Jun; 173(6):1863-70. PubMed ID: 15879765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
    Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional outcomes of 559 cases in Siriraj Hospital, Thailand.
    Wattayang P; Nualyong C; Leewansangtong S; Srinualnad S; Taweemonkongsap T; Chaiyaprasithi B; Amornvesukit T; Phinthusophon K; Jitpraphai S; Thiptirapong B; Sujijantararat P; Soontrapa S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Aug; 94(8):941-6. PubMed ID: 21863675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005.
    Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: an outcomes-based evolution.
    Harris MJ
    Eur Urol; 2007 Jul; 52(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 17084506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current results and patient selection for nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.
    Steiner MS
    Semin Urol Oncol; 1995 Aug; 13(3):204-14. PubMed ID: 8521134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.