These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21116397)

  • 21. [An overview of multiple linear regression model and its application].
    Hu YH; Yu SC; Qi X; Zheng WJ; Wang QQ; Yao HY
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 53(6):653-656. PubMed ID: 31177767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Judging a plethora of p-values: how to contend with the problem of multiple testing--part 10 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.
    Victor A; Elsässer A; Hommel G; Blettner M
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2010 Jan; 107(4):50-6. PubMed ID: 20165700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Methods for comparing the results of different studies.
    Eckert SE; Choi YG; Koka S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 14579958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Critical appraisal of scientific articles: part 1 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.
    du Prel JB; Röhrig B; Blettner M
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2009 Feb; 106(7):100-5. PubMed ID: 19562021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Statistical analysis and reporting: common errors found during peer review and how to avoid them.
    Worthy G
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2015; 145():w14076. PubMed ID: 25650947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Narrative Review of Statistical Reporting Checklists, Mandatory Statistical Editing, and Rectifying Common Problems in the Reporting of Scientific Articles.
    Dexter F; Shafer SL
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Mar; 124(3):943-947. PubMed ID: 27676281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Regression Analyses and Their Particularities in Observational Studies—Part 32 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications.
    Zapf A; Wiessner C; König IR
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2024 Feb; 121(4):128-134. PubMed ID: 38231741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Statistical reviewing for medical journals.
    Altman DG
    Stat Med; 1998 Dec; 17(23):2661-74. PubMed ID: 9881413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hybrid models were found to be very elegant to disentangle longitudinal within- and between-subject relationships.
    Twisk JWR; de Vente W
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Mar; 107():66-70. PubMed ID: 30500406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. How To Lie with Statistics and Figures.
    Parks J; Yeh DD
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2021 Aug; 22(6):611-619. PubMed ID: 34270365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Synthesis of linear regression coefficients by recovering the within-study covariance matrix from summary statistics.
    Yoneoka D; Henmi M
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):212-219. PubMed ID: 27987264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Primer on multiple regression models for diagnostic imaging research.
    Gareen IF; Gatsonis C
    Radiology; 2003 Nov; 229(2):305-10. PubMed ID: 14595133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Statistics must be seen and scrutinized! Fundamental to the progress of medical science--yet neglected in medical journals].
    Taube A
    Lakartidningen; 2002 Dec; 99(51-52):5176-9. PubMed ID: 12572313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quality of scientific articles.
    Szklo M
    Rev Saude Publica; 2006 Aug; 40 Spec no.():30-5. PubMed ID: 16924300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparison of application of Cochran-Armitage trend test and linear regression analysis for rate trend analysis in epidemiology study].
    Wang DZ; Wang C; Shen CF; Zhang Y; Zhang H; Song GD; Xue XD; Xu ZL; Zhang S; Jiang GH
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2017 May; 38(5):684-687. PubMed ID: 28651412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Overoptimism in the interpretation of statistics: the ethical role of statistical reviewers in medical journals.
    Poole D; Nattino G; Bertolini G
    Intensive Care Med; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1927-9. PubMed ID: 25288213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Insignificance of Significance in Scientific Reporting.
    Pollock NW
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2019 Sep; 30(3):225-226. PubMed ID: 31399348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression.
    Baker WL; White CM; Cappelleri JC; Kluger J; Coleman CI;
    Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Oct; 63(10):1426-34. PubMed ID: 19769699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Passive smoking and replication.
    Ebers G
    Eur J Neurol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1263-4. PubMed ID: 19049541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Common misconceptions about data analysis and statistics.
    Motulsky HJ
    Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol; 2014 Nov; 387(11):1017-23. PubMed ID: 25213136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.