173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21116675)
1. Occlusal caries depth measurements obtained by five different imaging modalities.
Kamburoğlu K; Kurt H; Kolsuz E; Öztaş B; Tatar I; Çelik HH
J Digit Imaging; 2011 Oct; 24(5):804-13. PubMed ID: 21116675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occlusal caries detection by using a cone-beam CT with different voxel resolutions and a digital intraoral sensor.
Kamburoğlu K; Murat S; Yüksel SP; Cebeci AR; Paksoy CS
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e63-9. PubMed ID: 20416522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions.
Haiter-Neto F; Wenzel A; Gotfredsen E
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 18195250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
Abreu Júnior M; Tyndall DA; Platin E; Ludlow JB; Phillips C
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
Cheng JG; Zhang ZL; Wang XY; Zhang ZY; Ma XC; Li G
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1015-21. PubMed ID: 21805053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An ex vivo comparative study of occlusal and proximal caries using terahertz and X-ray imaging.
Kamburoğlu K; Karagöz B; Altan H; Özen D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Feb; 48(2):20180250. PubMed ID: 30379560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities in detection of proximal caries.
Senel B; Kamburoglu K; Uçok O; Yüksel SP; Ozen T; Avsever H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Dec; 39(8):501-11. PubMed ID: 21062944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with intraoral radiography for the detection of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions.
Krzyżostaniak J; Surdacka A; Kulczyk T; Dyszkiewicz-Konwińska M; Owecka M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 24852420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of different display types in detection of recurrent caries under restorations by using CBCT.
Baltacıoĝlu İH; Eren H; Yavuz Y; Kamburoğlu K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(6):20160099. PubMed ID: 27319604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Accuracy of computer aided measurement for detecting dental proximal caries lesions in images of cone-beam computed tomography].
Zhang ZL; Li JP; Li G; Ma XC
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 52(2):103-108. PubMed ID: 28253585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images of different voxel resolutions used to detect simulated small internal resorption cavities.
Kamburoğlu K; Kursun S
Int Endod J; 2010 Sep; 43(9):798-807. PubMed ID: 20609023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of different radiographic methods for detecting occlusal caries lesions.
Tarım Ertas E; Küçükyılmaz E; Ertaş H; Savaş S; Yırcalı Atıcı M
Caries Res; 2014; 48(6):566-74. PubMed ID: 25073755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography and charge-coupled device sensors for detecting caries.
Young SM; Lee JT; Hodges RJ; Chang TL; Elashoff DA; White SC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Oct; 38(7):445-51. PubMed ID: 19767514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study.
Kamburoğlu K; Kiliç C; Ozen T; Yüksel SP
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):e34-42. PubMed ID: 19138636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of proximal caries depth measurements: comparison between limited cone beam computed tomography, storage phosphor and film radiography.
Akdeniz BG; Gröndahl HG; Magnusson B
Caries Res; 2006; 40(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 16707867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiographic modalities for the detection of noncavitated caries.
Krzyżostaniak J; Kulczyk T; Czarnecka B; Surdacka A
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Apr; 19(3):667-72. PubMed ID: 25059712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro comparison of high-definition US, CBCT and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of proximal and recurrent caries.
Şeker O; Kamburoğlu K; Şahin C; Eratam N; Çakmak EE; Sönmez G; Özen D
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2021 Dec; 50(8):20210026. PubMed ID: 33979235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ex vivo comparison of Galileos cone beam CT and intraoral radiographs in detecting occlusal caries.
Rathore S; Tyndall D; Wright J; Everett E
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):489-93. PubMed ID: 22184471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of Pseudocolor Filter in Micro-computed Tomography Images for Detection of Proximal and Occlusal Caries Lesions in Primary Molars.
Freitas SA; Panzarella FK; Karia RH; Cavaletti MR; Junqueira JLC; Oliveira LB
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Mar; 20(3):279-284. PubMed ID: 31204318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
