358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21117303)
1. [Costs of population cervical cancer screening program in Poland between 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Kedzia W; Molińska-Glura M; Seroczyński P; Januszek-Michalecka L; Rokita W; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):750-6. PubMed ID: 21117303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The organization and financing of cervical cancer prevention carried out by midwives in primary health care.
Sobczyk K; Woźniak-Holecka J; Holecki T; Szałabska D
Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(12):798-804. PubMed ID: 28098929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].
Spaczyński M; Nowak-Markwitz E; Januszek-Michalecka L; Karowicz-Bilińska A
Ginekol Pol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):833-8. PubMed ID: 20088397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Awareness of cervical cancer prevention among patients of gynecological outpatient clinic].
Ulman-Włodarz I; Nowosielski K; Romanik M; Pozowski J; Jurek M
Ginekol Pol; 2011 Jan; 82(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 21473052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prevention of cervical cancer with screening programme in Branicevo District and cost-effectiveness analysis adjusted to the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
Perovic S
J BUON; 2009; 14(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19373953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Treatment costs of malignant cervical cancer in Poland in 2011-2012--the case of Silesian Voivodeship].
Holecki T; Sobczyk K; Nawrocki S; Woźniak-Holecka J; Skrzypek M; Bocionek A
Ginekol Pol; 2015 Nov; 86(11):849-55. PubMed ID: 26817317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Production lost due to cervical cancer in Poland in 2012.
Dubas-Jakóbczyk K; Kocot E; Seweryn M; Koperny M
Med Pr; 2016; 67(3):289-99. PubMed ID: 27364103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of the National Population-Based Cervical Cancer Screening Programme in Poland--outcomes, problems and possible solutions 7 years after implementation.
Januszek-Michalecka L; Nowak-Markwitz E; Banach P; Spaczynski M
Ann Agric Environ Med; 2013; 20(4):859-64. PubMed ID: 24364469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Barriers to cervical cancer screening in women attending the Family Medical Program in Niterói, Rio de Janeiro.
Augusto EF; Rosa ML; Cavalcanti SM; Oliveira LH
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 22886356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Economic aspects of using selected biomarkers in cervical cancer screening].
Rokita W; Kedzia W; Gaj A; Kulig B
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):774-7. PubMed ID: 21117306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cancer in Poland: awareness, survival and therapy. Population based studies.
Jokiel M; Bielska-Lasota M
Przegl Epidemiol; 2005; 59(4):915-21. PubMed ID: 16729433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reimbursed Costs of Management of Uterine Cervical Lesions in Poland--a Descriptive Analysis of Data from the National Health Fund and the Ministry of Health.
Nowakowski A; Śliwczyński A; Seroczyński P; Cybulski M; Teter Z
Cent Eur J Public Health; 2016 Jun; 24(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 27178030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prophylactics of cervical cancer in Polish female population aged 45-54].
Bińkowska M; Debski R
Ginekol Pol; 2005 Nov; 76(11):863-70. PubMed ID: 16566360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cost effectiveness analysis of screening strategies for cervical cancer in Tunisia].
Lazaar HB; Aounallah-Skhiri H; Oueslati F; Frikha H; Achour N; Hsairi M
East Mediterr Health J; 2010 Jun; 16(6):602-8. PubMed ID: 20799586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Introducing HPV triage into the English cervical cancer screening program: consequences for participation.
Philips Z; Avis M; Whynes DK
Women Health; 2006; 43(2):17-34. PubMed ID: 17000609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What is the most cost-effective population-based cancer screening program for Chinese women?
Woo PP; Kim JJ; Leung GM
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Feb; 25(6):617-24. PubMed ID: 17308266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of delivery structure on costs, screening and health promotional services in state level National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Programs.
Trogdon JG; Ekwueme DU; Subramanian S; Miller JW; Wong FL
Cancer Causes Control; 2019 Aug; 30(8):813-818. PubMed ID: 31187351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
