BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21117306)

  • 1. [Economic aspects of using selected biomarkers in cervical cancer screening].
    Rokita W; Kedzia W; Gaj A; Kulig B
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):774-7. PubMed ID: 21117306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Costs of population cervical cancer screening program in Poland between 2007-2009].
    Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Kedzia W; Molińska-Glura M; Seroczyński P; Januszek-Michalecka L; Rokita W; Nowak-Markwitz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):750-6. PubMed ID: 21117303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevention of cervical cancer with screening programme in Branicevo District and cost-effectiveness analysis adjusted to the territory of the Republic of Serbia.
    Perovic S
    J BUON; 2009; 14(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19373953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical cancer knowledge and screening in Accra, Ghana.
    Adanu RM
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2002; 11(6):487-8. PubMed ID: 12225621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The organization and financing of cervical cancer prevention carried out by midwives in primary health care.
    Sobczyk K; Woźniak-Holecka J; Holecki T; Szałabska D
    Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(12):798-804. PubMed ID: 28098929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. COVID-19 pandemic causes cervical cancer screening crisis.
    Gourd E
    Lancet Oncol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1060. PubMed ID: 34175038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Please, no more deaths from neglect.
    Gunasekera PC; Karunaratne K
    Ceylon Med J; 1998 Sep; 43(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 9813929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Introducing HPV triage into the English cervical cancer screening program: consequences for participation.
    Philips Z; Avis M; Whynes DK
    Women Health; 2006; 43(2):17-34. PubMed ID: 17000609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should we abandon pap smear testing?
    DeMay RM
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Nov; 114 Suppl():S48-51. PubMed ID: 11996169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Costs and problems in cervix cancer screening are considerably underestimated].
    Bistoletti P
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Aug; 97(32-33):3506-8. PubMed ID: 11037597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical cancer prevention--cervical screening: science in evolution.
    Safaeian M; Solomon D; Castle PE
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2007 Dec; 34(4):739-60, ix. PubMed ID: 18061867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
    Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening for cervical cancer in low-resource settings in 2011.
    Patrizzi B
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Feb; 138(2):156. PubMed ID: 24476514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical screening program for Sri Lanka--can we afford it?
    Sirisena J
    Ceylon Med J; 1999 Mar; 44(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10643099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening for cervical cancer in low-resource settings in 2011.
    Tambouret R
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2013 Jun; 137(6):782-90. PubMed ID: 23721273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening program serves fraction of those eligible.
    Finkelstein JB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Feb; 99(4):270-1. PubMed ID: 17312302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical cancer and the global health agenda: Insights from multiple policy-analysis frameworks.
    Parkhurst JO; Vulimiri M
    Glob Public Health; 2013; 8(10):1093-108. PubMed ID: 24236409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a public health research program for ovarian cancer.
    Eheman CR; Peipins L; Wynn M; Ryerson B; Stewart SL; Coughlin SS; Hawkins NA; Saraiya M
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2006 May; 15(4):339-45. PubMed ID: 16724881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The cervical screening muddle.
    Thornton H
    Lancet; 1998 Apr; 351(9109):1130-1. PubMed ID: 9660605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?
    Linder J
    Cytopathology; 2002 Feb; 13(1):66. PubMed ID: 11985572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.