These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21117307)

  • 21. [An analysis of prognostic significance of new FIGO staging (1989) of endometrial cancer].
    Nishiya M; Sakuragi N; Tanaka T; Ohkohchi T; Takeda N; Tsumura N; Hirahatake K; Satoh C; Fujimoto S
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Apr; 43(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 2066616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Significance of prognostic evaluation of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2009 staging system on stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma].
    Wang ZQ; Zhang Y; Wang JL; Shen DH; Mu T; Zhao X; Yao YY; Bai Y; Wei LH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jan; 47(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 22455691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Lymphadenectomy increases the prognostic value of the revised 2009 FIGO staging system for endometrial cancer: a multi-center study.
    Kim HS; Kim HY; Park CY; Lee JM; Lee JK; Cho CH; Kim SM; Kim JW
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):230-7. PubMed ID: 22244682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [The current staging for uterine body malignancies and its importance for clinical practice].
    Sehnal B; Benková K; Kmoníčková E; Driák D; Spůrková Z; Maxová K; Sláma J
    Cesk Patol; 2014 Apr; 50(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 24758507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bone metastasis from gynecologic carcinomas: a clinicopathologic study.
    Abdul-Karim FW; Kida M; Wentz WB; Carter JR; Sorensen K; Macfee M; Zika J; Makley JT
    Gynecol Oncol; 1990 Nov; 39(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 2227582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Classification and staging of malignant tumours in the female pelvis.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1971; 50(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 5558593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Revised FIGO staging for corpus and vulvar carcinoma].
    Barth JA
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1990; 112(22):1437. PubMed ID: 2281739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Revision of FIGO surgical staging in 2009 for endometrial cancer validates to improve risk stratification.
    Werner HM; Trovik J; Marcickiewicz J; Tingulstad S; Staff AC; Amant F; Salvesen HB;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 22100838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Revised FIGO staging for gynaecological cancer.
    Shepherd JH
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Aug; 96(8):889-92. PubMed ID: 2775686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Current FIGO Staging for Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri and Treatment of Particular Stages.
    Sehnal B; Kmoníčková E; Sláma J; Tomancová V; Zikán M
    Klin Onkol; 2019; 32(3):224-231. PubMed ID: 31216857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Site-specific factors for cancer of the corpus uteri from SEER registries: collaborative stage data collection system, version 1 and version 2.
    Jamison PM; Altekruse SF; Chang JT; Zahn J; Lee R; Noone AM; Barroilhet L
    Cancer; 2014 Dec; 120 Suppl 23():3836-45. PubMed ID: 25412395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Indications and techniques for robotic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic oncology.
    Wisner KP; Gupta S; Ahmad S; Holloway RW
    J Surg Oncol; 2015 Dec; 112(7):782-9. PubMed ID: 26288990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sentinel node procedures in gynecologic cancers: an overview.
    Van Oostrum NH; Makar AP; Van Den Broecke R
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Feb; 91(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 22007672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Non-uterine gynecological sarcomas.
    Leppien G
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1987; 241(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 3314737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Is there a revision needed of the current FIGO staging system?
    Menczer J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Oct; 96(10):1159-1161. PubMed ID: 28718876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Problematic issues in the staging of endometrial, cervical and vulval carcinomas.
    Hirschowitz L; Nucci M; Zaino RJ
    Histopathology; 2013 Jan; 62(1):176-202. PubMed ID: 23240675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Staging laparotomy in gynecologic cancer].
    Tsukamoto N
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Aug; 41(8):1009-14. PubMed ID: 2681452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Multiple cancers in gynecologic oncology].
    Schröcksnadel H; Fuith LC; Hetzel H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Oct; 48(10):710-4. PubMed ID: 3234703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prognostic significance of gross myometrial invasion with endometrial cancer.
    Larson DM; Connor GP; Broste SK; Krawisz BR; Johnson KK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Sep; 88(3):394-8. PubMed ID: 8752246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimating the depth of myometrial involvement by endometrial carcinoma: efficacy of transvaginal sonography vs MR imaging.
    DelMaschio A; Vanzulli A; Sironi S; Spagnolo D; Belloni C; Garancini P; Taccagni GL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 8430547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.