1076 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21117705)
1. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations.
Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jan; 51(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 21117705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking.
Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Aug; 18(32):22129-39. PubMed ID: 27444142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Develop and test a solvent accessible surface area-based model in conformational entropy calculations.
Wang J; Hou T
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1199-212. PubMed ID: 22497310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 7. Entropy effects on the performance of end-point binding free energy calculation approaches.
Sun H; Duan L; Chen F; Liu H; Wang Z; Pan P; Zhu F; Zhang JZH; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2018 May; 20(21):14450-14460. PubMed ID: 29785435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. The accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking.
Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W
J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(5):866-77. PubMed ID: 20949517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 3. The impact of force fields and ligand charge models.
Xu L; Sun H; Li Y; Wang J; Hou T
J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jul; 117(28):8408-21. PubMed ID: 23789789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Impacts of enhanced sampling and variable dielectric model on protein-protein Interactions.
Wang E; Weng G; Sun H; Du H; Zhu F; Chen F; Wang Z; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 Sep; 21(35):18958-18969. PubMed ID: 31453590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 4. Accuracies of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methodologies evaluated by various simulation protocols using PDBbind data set.
Sun H; Li Y; Tian S; Xu L; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2014 Aug; 16(31):16719-29. PubMed ID: 24999761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.
Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of an automated procedure for the prediction of relative free energies of binding on a set of aldose reductase inhibitors.
Ferrari AM; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M; Rastelli G
Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 15(24):7865-77. PubMed ID: 17870536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the Performance of MM/PBSA, MM/GBSA, and QM-MM/GBSA Approaches on Protein/Carbohydrate Complexes: Effect of Implicit Solvent Models, QM Methods, and Entropic Contributions.
Mishra SK; Koča J
J Phys Chem B; 2018 Aug; 122(34):8113-8121. PubMed ID: 30084252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 9. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for protein-peptide complexes.
Weng G; Wang E; Chen F; Sun H; Wang Z; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 May; 21(19):10135-10145. PubMed ID: 31062799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies.
Genheden S; Ryde U
Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities.
Genheden S; Ryde U
Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2015 May; 10(5):449-61. PubMed ID: 25835573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Molecular dynamics investigation on a series of HIV protease inhibitors: assessing the performance of MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA approaches.
Srivastava HK; Sastry GN
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):3088-98. PubMed ID: 23121465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 5. Improved docking performance using high solute dielectric constant MM/GBSA and MM/PBSA rescoring.
Sun H; Li Y; Shen M; Tian S; Xu L; Pan P; Guan Y; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2014 Oct; 16(40):22035-45. PubMed ID: 25205360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A QM/MM study of the binding of RAPTA ligands to cathepsin B.
Ciancetta A; Genheden S; Ryde U
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2011 Aug; 25(8):729-42. PubMed ID: 21701919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and Evaluation of MM/GBSA Based on a Variable Dielectric GB Model for Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities.
Wang E; Liu H; Wang J; Weng G; Sun H; Wang Z; Kang Y; Hou T
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5353-5365. PubMed ID: 32175734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. How Well Does the Extended Linear Interaction Energy Method Perform in Accurate Binding Free Energy Calculations?
Hao D; He X; Ji B; Zhang S; Wang J
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Dec; 60(12):6624-6633. PubMed ID: 33213150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of radii sets, entropy, QM methods, and sampling on MM-PBSA, MM-GBSA, and QM/MM-GBSA ligand binding energies of F. tularensis enoyl-ACP reductase (FabI).
Su PC; Tsai CC; Mehboob S; Hevener KE; Johnson ME
J Comput Chem; 2015 Sep; 36(25):1859-73. PubMed ID: 26216222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
