These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21117751)

  • 1. Effects of background noise level on behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression.
    Gregan MJ; Nelson PB; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3018-25. PubMed ID: 21117751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression: additivity of forward masking in noise-masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Gregan MJ; Nelson PB; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):2835-44. PubMed ID: 22087912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory-filter characteristics for listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment.
    Desloge JG; Reed CM; Braida LD; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Mar; 16(1):19-39. PubMed ID: 22593204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise: hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Summers V; Makashay MJ; Theodoroff SM; Leek MR
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):274-92. PubMed ID: 23636209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.
    Reed CM; Braida LD; Zurek PM
    Trends Amplif; 2009 Mar; 13(1):4-43. PubMed ID: 19074452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Short-term temporal integration: evidence for the influence of peripheral compression.
    Oxenham AJ; Moore BC; Vickers DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3676-87. PubMed ID: 9193055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection threshold for sound distortion resulting from noise reduction in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1375. PubMed ID: 25190410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age.
    Kortlang S; Mauermann M; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():27-40. PubMed ID: 26471199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A behavioral measure of basilar-membrane nonlinearity in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Oxenham AJ; Plack CJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3666-75. PubMed ID: 9193054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies.
    Oxenham AJ; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2248-57. PubMed ID: 15532656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG; Summers V; Grassi E; Grant KW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.
    Leong UC; Schwarz DM; Henry KS; Carney LH
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):1009-1019. PubMed ID: 31985535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimates of compression at low and high frequencies using masking additivity in normal and impaired ears.
    Plack CJ; Oxenham AJ; Simonson AM; O'Hanlon CG; Drga V; Arifianto D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4321-30. PubMed ID: 18537383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
    Goldsworthy RL; Delhorne LA; Braida LD; Reed CM
    Trends Amplif; 2013 Mar; 17(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 23429419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kreft HA; Wojtczak M; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Feb; 143(2):901. PubMed ID: 29495696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Svec A; Dubno JR; Nelson PB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1195-203. PubMed ID: 27036255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.