218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21118352)
1. Justice in international clinical research.
Pratt B; Loff B
Dev World Bioeth; 2011 Aug; 11(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 21118352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A framework to link international clinical research to the promotion of justice in global health.
Pratt B; Loff B
Bioethics; 2014 Oct; 28(8):387-96. PubMed ID: 23278523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating the capacity of theories of justice to serve as a justice framework for international clinical research.
Pratt B; Zion D; Loff B
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(11):30-41. PubMed ID: 23072678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. For-profit clinical trials in developing countries--those troublesome patient benefits.
Schuklenk U
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):52-4. PubMed ID: 20526975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple forms of exploitation in international research: the need for multiple standards of fairness.
Snyder J
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):40-1. PubMed ID: 20526969
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. International research and positive obligations: are they "transaction specific"?
Rossi J
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):49-51. PubMed ID: 20526974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The perverse consequences of a proposed global tax on research.
MacDonald C; Walton N
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):46-7. PubMed ID: 20526972
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human rights: the normative engine of fairness and research in developing countries.
McMillan J
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):47-9. PubMed ID: 20526973
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Justice in the application of science: beyond fair benefits.
London AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):54-6. PubMed ID: 20526976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Should Social Value Obligations be Local or Global?
Nayak R; Shah SK
Bioethics; 2017 Feb; 31(2):116-127. PubMed ID: 28060432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to do research fairly in an unjust world.
Ballantyne AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):26-35. PubMed ID: 20526966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Taking up Daniels' challenge: The case for global health justice.
Ooms G; Hammonds R
Health Hum Rights; 2010 Jun; 12(1):29-46. PubMed ID: 20930252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Why adopt a maximin theory of exploitation?
Wertheimer A; Millum J; Schaefer GO
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):38-9. PubMed ID: 20526968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Justifying community benefit requirements in international research.
Hughes RC
Bioethics; 2014 Oct; 28(8):397-404. PubMed ID: 23025255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standard of care, institutional obligations, and distributive justice.
MacKay D
Bioethics; 2015 May; 29(4):262-73. PubMed ID: 24117682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of justice frameworks for international research.
Pratt B; Loff B
J Med Ethics; 2015 Jul; 41(7):539-44. PubMed ID: 25378552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applying a global justice lens to health systems research ethics: an initial exploration.
Pratt B; Hyder AA
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2015 Mar; 25(1):35-66. PubMed ID: 25843119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response to open peer commentaries on "How to do research fairly in an unjust world".
Ballantyne AJ
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Jun; 10(6):W4-6. PubMed ID: 20526959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Linking international clinical research with stateless populations to justice in global health.
Pratt B; Zion D; Lwin KM; Cheah PY; Nosten F; Loff B
BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Jun; 15():49. PubMed ID: 24969638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developing medicines in line with global public health needs: the role of the World Health Organization.
Pang T
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2011 Apr; 20(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 21435304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
