These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21119357)
1. A comparative pilot study of two dental implant metals in a pig model. Rodella LF; Favero G; Sala L; Buffoli B; Castelli G; Belloni V; Paganelli C; Rezzani R Implant Dent; 2010 Dec; 19(6):532-8. PubMed ID: 21119357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of titanium dental implant osseointegration in posterior edentulous areas of micro swine. Hale TM; Boretsky BB; Scheidt MJ; McQuade MJ; Strong SL; Van Dyke TE J Oral Implantol; 1991; 17(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 1811062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone reactions to early occlusal loading of two-stage titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in monkeys. Piattelli A; Corigliano M; Scarano A; Quaranta M Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Apr; 17(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 9497710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Lioubavina-Hack N; Lang NP; Karring T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 16672018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo. Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A pilot study of complete edentulous rehabilitation with immediate function using a new implant design: case series. Maló P; Nobre Mde A; Petersson U; Wigren S Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 17100748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A new animal model for molecular biological analysis of the implant-tissue interface: spatial expression of type XII collagen mRNA around a titanium oral implant. Karimbux NY; Sirakian A; Weber HP; Nishimura I J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(2):107-13; discussion 114-5. PubMed ID: 8699501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of zirconia and titanium implants after a short healing period. A pilot study in minipigs. Stadlinger B; Hennig M; Eckelt U; Kuhlisch E; Mai R Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jun; 39(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 20172693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Histomorphometric evaluation of implant design as a key factor in peri-implant bone response: a preliminary study in a dog model. Orsini E; Salgarello S; Bubalo M; Lazic Z; Trire A; Martini D; Franchi M; Ruggeri A Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Jun; 58(6):263-75. PubMed ID: 19516235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study. Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model. Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values. Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of ultraviolet photoactivation of titanium on osseointegration in a rat model. Ueno T; Yamada M; Hori N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 20369086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model. Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Osseointegration of one-piece zirconia implants compared with a titanium implant of identical design: a histomorphometric study in the dog. Koch FP; Weng D; Krämer S; Biesterfeld S; Jahn-Eimermacher A; Wagner W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 20074240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant osseointegration in the absence of primary bone anchorage: a clinical report. Villa R; Polimeni G; Wikesjö UM J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Nov; 104(5):282-7. PubMed ID: 20970533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do implant surfaces make a difference? Meffert RM Curr Opin Periodontol; 1997; 4():104-8. PubMed ID: 9655029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs. Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]