These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

353 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21119853)

  • 1. Why pigeons say what they do: reinforcer magnitude and response requirement effects on say responding in say-do correspondence.
    da Silva SP; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):395-413. PubMed ID: 21119853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correspondence as conditional stimulus control: insights from experiments with pigeons.
    Lattal KA; Doepke KJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):127-44. PubMed ID: 11421307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The emergence of symmetry in a conditional discrimination task using different responses as propioceptive samples in pigeons.
    García A; Benjumea S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 16903493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Animal procrastination: Pigeons choose to defer experiencing an aversive gap or a peck requirement.
    Zentall TR; Peng D; House D; Halloran M
    Learn Behav; 2020 Jun; 48(2):246-253. PubMed ID: 31845110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Choice with certain and uncertain reinforcers in an adjusting-delay procedure.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Jul; 66(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 8755700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contingent stimuli signal subsequent reinforcer ratios.
    Boutros N; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jul; 96(1):39-61. PubMed ID: 21765545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reinforcer control by comparison-stimulus color and location in a delayed matching-to-sample task.
    Alsop B; Jones BM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 May; 89(3):311-31. PubMed ID: 18540217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.
    Schaal DW; Shahan TA; Kovera CA; Reilly MP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Mar; 69(2):103-22. PubMed ID: 9540229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention, the presolution period, and choice accuracy in pigeons.
    Chase S; Schupak C; Ploog BO
    Behav Processes; 2012 Mar; 89(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 22138233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Discrimination of response-reinforcer and response-stimulus contingencies in pigeons.
    Dodd PW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 Jan; 41(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 6699541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Responding during reinforcement delay in a self-control paradigm.
    Logue AW; Peña-Correal TE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1984 May; 41(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 6736857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Choice with probabilistic reinforcement: effects of delay and conditioned reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jan; 55(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 2002302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expectancies of reinforcer location and quality as cues for a conditional discrimination in pigeons.
    Williams DA; Butler MM; Overmier JB
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1990 Jan; 16(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 2303792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conditioned reinforcement and choice with delayed and uncertain primary reinforcers.
    Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Mar; 63(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 7714448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Errorless learning of a conditional temporal discrimination.
    Arantes J; Machado A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jan; 95(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 21541167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An operant analog of food caching in the pigeon (Columba livia).
    Roberts WA
    Learn Behav; 2022 Mar; 50(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 34287804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning by pigeons playing against tit-for-tat in an operant prisoner's dilemma.
    Sanabria F; Baker F; Rachlin H
    Learn Behav; 2003 Nov; 31(4):318-31. PubMed ID: 14733481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Food-paired stimuli as conditioned reinforcers: effects of d-amphetamine.
    Cohen SL; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Sep; 56(2):277-88. PubMed ID: 1955817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Should I stay or should I go? Pigeons' (Columba livia) performance of a foraging task has implications for optimal foraging theory and serial pattern learning.
    Chandel H; Boring M; Zentall TR; Wasserman EA
    J Comp Psychol; 2021 May; 135(2):266-272. PubMed ID: 33523682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.