These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21119856)

  • 1. Concurrent reinforcement schedules for problem behavior and appropriate behavior: experimental applications of the matching law.
    Borrero CS; Vollmer TR; Borrero JC; Bourret JC; Sloman KN; Samaha AL; Dallery J
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):455-69. PubMed ID: 21119856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of fixed-time reinforcement schedules on resurgence of problem behavior.
    Marsteller TM; St Peter CC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(3):455-69. PubMed ID: 24844682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior increases resistance to extinction: clinical demonstration, animal modeling, and clinical test of one solution.
    Mace FC; McComas JJ; Mauro BC; Progar PR; Taylor B; Ervin R; Zangrillo AN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 May; 93(3):349-67. PubMed ID: 21119850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantification of ethanol's antipunishment effect in humans using the generalized matching equation.
    Rasmussen EB; Newland MC
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Sep; 92(2):161-80. PubMed ID: 20354597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
    Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training.
    Winborn-Kemmerer L; Ringdahl JE; Wacker DP; Kitsukawa K
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(1):185-9. PubMed ID: 19721740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Zebrafish choice behavior is sensitive to reinforcer rate, immediacy, and magnitude ratios.
    Kuroda T; Ritchey CM; Podlesnik CA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Sep; 116(2):182-207. PubMed ID: 34223635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection dynamics in joint matching to rate and magnitude of reinforcement.
    McDowell JJ; Popa A; Calvin NT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Sep; 98(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 23008523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of choice for pigeons and humans on concurrent-chains schedules of reinforcement.
    Belke TW; Pierce WD; Powell RA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1989 Sep; 52(2):97-109. PubMed ID: 2794844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The identities hidden in the matching laws, and their uses.
    Thorne DR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Mar; 93(2):247-60. PubMed ID: 20885813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evolutionary theory prediction: Response rate as a joint function of reinforcement rate and reinforcer magnitude.
    McDowell JJ; Arashanapalli S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Sep; 116(2):225-242. PubMed ID: 34383960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An application of the matching law to severe problem behavior.
    Borrero JC; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2002; 35(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 11936543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Choice dynamics in concurrent ratio schedules of reinforcement.
    Bellow D; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Mar; 119(2):337-355. PubMed ID: 36718124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concurrent schedules of differential reinforcement of alternative behavior in the treatment of problem behavior without extinction.
    Fleck CR; Bourret JC; Jehle ER
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2023 Jun; 56(3):623-637. PubMed ID: 37088926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Barycentric extension of generalized matching.
    Jensen G; Neuringer A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2009 Sep; 92(2):139-59. PubMed ID: 20354596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
    Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does sensitivity to magnitude depend on the temporal distribution of reinforcement?
    Grace RC; Bragason O
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Mar; 83(2):169-84. PubMed ID: 15828593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concurrent schedules: How responses per reinforcer affects estimates of sensitivity to reinforcement.
    Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2021 Jul; 116(1):114-123. PubMed ID: 33997983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signaled reinforcement: Effects of signal reliability on choice between signaled and unsignaled alternatives.
    Gomes-Ng S; Macababbad AC; Bai JYH; Baharrizki D; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2020 May; 174():104088. PubMed ID: 32092454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. "Other" behavior and the DRO: The roles of extinction and reinforcement.
    Hangen MM; Romero AN; Neidert PL; Borrero JC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Sep; 53(4):2385-2404. PubMed ID: 32638398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.