These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21122767)
1. Assisted suicide laws create discriminatory double standard for who gets suicide prevention and who gets suicide assistance: Not Dead Yet responds to Autonomy, Inc. Coleman D Disabil Health J; 2010 Jan; 3(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 21122767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Montana's courting of physician aid in dying. Could Des Moines follow suit? Svenson AG Politics Life Sci; 2010 Sep; 29(2):2-16. PubMed ID: 21761978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recognizing a fundamental liberty interest protecting the right to die: an analysis of statutes which criminalize or legalize physician-assisted suicide. Tarnow WJ Elder Law J; 1996; 4(2):407-57. PubMed ID: 16086518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Foreword: can Glucksberg survive Lawrence? Another look at the end of life and personal autonomy. Kamisar Y Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1453-78. PubMed ID: 18595210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington. U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, en banc Fed Report; 1996 Mar; 79():790-859. PubMed ID: 11648417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physician-assisted suicide and the Supreme Court: the Washington and Vacco verdicts. Candilis PJ; Appelbaum KL J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(4):595-606. PubMed ID: 9460047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician-assisted suicide in Oregon: a medical perspective. Hendin H; Foley K Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1613-40. PubMed ID: 18595218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Washington v. Glucksberg was tragically wrong. Chemerinsky E Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1501-16. PubMed ID: 18595212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In the laboratory of the states: the progress of Glucksberg's invitation to states to address end-of-life choice. Tucker KL Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1593-612. PubMed ID: 18595217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prohibition on assisting a suicide is interference with rights of severely disabled people, UK Supreme Court is told. Dyer C BMJ; 2013 Dec; 347():f7589. PubMed ID: 24352939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Physician assisted suicide and the Supreme Court: putting the constitutional claim to rest. Mariner WK Am J Public Health; 1997 Dec; 87(12):2058-62. PubMed ID: 9431307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Donaldson v. Van de Kamp: cryonics, assisted suicide, and the challenges of medical science. Pommer RW J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1993; 9():589-603. PubMed ID: 10183890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Baxter v. Montana, libertarianism, and end-of-life: the ripe time for a paradigm shift. Ruble JH J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother; 2010 Sep; 24(3):263-70. PubMed ID: 20718648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The body and the body politic: assisted suicide under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Weinrib LE McGill Law J; 1994; 39(3):618-43. PubMed ID: 16514762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oregon versus Ashcroft: pain relief, physician-assisted suicide, and the Controlled Substances Act. Rich BA Pain Med; 2002 Dec; 3(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 15099245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington. U.S. District Court, W.D. Washington, at Seattle Fed Suppl; 1994 May; 850():1454-68. PubMed ID: 11648411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assisted suicide and disabled people. Mikochik SL De Paul Law Rev; 1997; 46(4):987-1002. PubMed ID: 11657536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]