119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2112277)
1. Evaluation of the polyethylene glycol-potentiated indirect antiglobulin test.
Wenz B; Apuzzo J; Shah DP
Transfusion; 1990 May; 30(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 2112277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Advantages of polyethylene glycol in comparison to bovine serum albumin in the indirect antiglobulin test in pregnant women].
Trkuljić M; Ostojić G; Taseski J
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2000; 57(5):43-7. PubMed ID: 11213674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increased detection of clinically significant antibodies and decreased incidence of delayed haemolytic transfusion reaction with the indirect antiglobulin test potentiated by polyethylene glycol compared to albumin: a Japanese study.
Okutsu M; Ohto H; Yasuda H; Kawabata K; Ono S; Saito S; Sugawara A; Kikuchi M; Miura S; Ishii Y; Watanabe K; Tohyama Y; Nollet KE
Blood Transfus; 2011 Jul; 9(3):311-9. PubMed ID: 21251459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hemolytic transfusion reaction due to Rh antibodies detectable only by manual polybrene and polyethylene glycol technique.
Lin CK; Wong KF; Mak KH; Yuen CM; Lee AW
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Dec; 104(6):660-2. PubMed ID: 8526209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of the polyethyleneglycol antiglobulin test in the detection and identification of erythrocyte antibodies].
Jiménez Marco MT; Hernández Maraver D; Rodríguez de la Rua A; de la Cámara Mendizábal C; Canales Albendea M; Jiménez Yuste V; Hernández Navarro F
Sangre (Barc); 1998 Feb; 43(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 9577178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Value of using polyethylene glycol in the indirect antiglobulin test with erythrocytes].
Michalewska B; Walewska I; Seyfriedowa H; Kuśnierz-Alejska G
Acta Haematol Pol; 1991; 22(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 1823951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lack of clinical significance of "enzyme-only" red cell alloantibodies.
Issitt PD; Combs MR; Bredehoeft SJ; Campbell ML; Heimer M; Joyner L; Lorentsen L; Remley C; Bullock S; Bumgarner J
Transfusion; 1993 Apr; 33(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 8480348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the polyethylene glycol-indirect antiglobulin test for routine compatibility testing.
Slater JL; Griswold DJ; Wojtyniak LS; Reisling MJ
Transfusion; 1989 Oct; 29(8):686-8. PubMed ID: 2799893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Indirect antiglobulin test-crossmatch using low-ionic-strength saline-albumin enhancement medium and reduced incubation time: effectiveness in the detection of most clinically significant antibodies and impact on blood utilization.
Dinardo CL; Bonifácio SL; Mendrone A
Immunohematology; 2014; 30(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 25238242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Polyethylene glycol improves the indirect antiglobulin test.
Wenz B; Apuzzo J
Transfusion; 1989; 29(3):218-20. PubMed ID: 2922789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the polyethylene glycol antiglobulin test and the use of enzymes in antibody detection and identification.
Reisner R; Butler G; Bundy K; Moore SB
Transfusion; 1996 Jun; 36(6):487-9. PubMed ID: 8669077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the polyethylene glycol antiglobulin test for detection of red blood cell antibodies.
de Man AJ; Overbeeke MA
Vox Sang; 1990; 58(3):207-10. PubMed ID: 2339531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a modified IAT-gel with polyethylenglycol (PEG) addition method for red blood cell antibody identification.
Gustafsson L; Wikman A; Lundahl J
J Clin Lab Anal; 2004; 18(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 15103680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polyethylene glycol antiglobulin tube versus gel microcolumn: influence on the incidence of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions and delayed serologic transfusion reactions.
Winters JL; Richa EM; Bryant SC; Tauscher CD; Bendix BJ; Stubbs JR
Transfusion; 2010 Jul; 50(7):1444-52. PubMed ID: 20230534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surface decoration of red blood cells with maleimidophenyl-polyethylene glycol facilitated by thiolation with iminothiolane: an approach to mask A, B, and D antigens to generate universal red blood cells.
Nacharaju P; Boctor FN; Manjula BN; Acharya SA
Transfusion; 2005 Mar; 45(3):374-83. PubMed ID: 15752155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decreased immunorejection in unmatched blood transfusions by attachment of methoxypolyethylene glycol on human red blood cells and the effect on D antigen.
Tan Y; Qiu Y; Xu H; Ji S; Li S; Gong F; Zhang Y
Transfusion; 2006 Dec; 46(12):2122-7. PubMed ID: 17176324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. K, Fy(a), and Jk(a) phenotyping of donor RBCs on microplates.
Diedrich B; Andersson J; Sallander S; Shanwell A
Transfusion; 2001 Oct; 41(10):1263-7. PubMed ID: 11606826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitivity of routine blood bank methods for the detection of anti-D as determined during proficiency testing.
Pinkerton PH; Zuber ED; Barr RM; Croucher BE; Quantz MC; Rapson DA; Wood DE; Crockford J; Moore BP
Am J Clin Pathol; 1984 Sep; 82(3):326-9. PubMed ID: 6431798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An autoanalyzer test to determine immunoglobulin class and IgG subclass of blood group antibodies.
Szymanski IO; Huff SR; Delsignore R
Transfusion; 1982; 22(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 6803411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can serological methods help distinguish between prophylactic and alloimmune anti-D?
Irving C; Crennan M; Vanniasinkam T
Transfus Med; 2017 Oct; 27 Suppl 5():362-368. PubMed ID: 28508562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
