These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21123266)

  • 1. The importance of surface-based cues for face discrimination in non-human primates.
    Parr LA; Taubert J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Jul; 278(1714):1964-72. PubMed ID: 21123266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recognizing facial cues: individual discrimination by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Parr LA; Winslow JT; Hopkins WD; de Waal FB
    J Comp Psychol; 2000 Mar; 114(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 10739311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) lack expertise in face processing.
    Parr LA; Heintz M; Pradhan G
    J Comp Psychol; 2008 Nov; 122(4):390-402. PubMed ID: 19014263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geometric distortions affect face recognition in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Taubert J; Parr LA
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Jan; 14(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 20632050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The composite face effect in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Taubert J; Qureshi AA; Parr LA
    J Comp Psychol; 2012 Nov; 126(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 22390621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The organization of conspecific face space in nonhuman primates.
    Parr LA; Taubert J; Little AC; Hancock PJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2411-34. PubMed ID: 22670823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The inversion effect reveals species differences in face processing.
    Parr LA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 Sep; 138(1):204-10. PubMed ID: 21784381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual kin recognition in nonhuman primates: (Pan troglodytes and Macaca mulatta): inbreeding avoidance or male distinctiveness?
    Parr LA; Heintz M; Lonsdorf E; Wroblewski E
    J Comp Psychol; 2010 Nov; 124(4):343-50. PubMed ID: 21090888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How the Thatcher illusion reveals evolutionary differences in the face processing of primates.
    Weldon KB; Taubert J; Smith CL; Parr LA
    Anim Cogn; 2013 Sep; 16(5):691-700. PubMed ID: 23420511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What meaning means for same and different: Analogical reasoning in humans (Homo sapiens), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Flemming TM; Beran MJ; Thompson RK; Kleider HM; Washburn DA
    J Comp Psychol; 2008 May; 122(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 18489233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Matching visual stimuli on the basis of global and local features by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Hopkins WD; Washburn DA
    Anim Cogn; 2002 Mar; 5(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 11957399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Processing of form stimuli presented unilaterally in humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and monkeys (Macaca mulatta).
    Hopkins WD; Washburn DA; Rumbaugh DM
    Behav Neurosci; 1990 Aug; 104(4):577-82. PubMed ID: 2206427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evolution of face processing in primates.
    Parr LA
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2011 Jun; 366(1571):1764-77. PubMed ID: 21536559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination of faces and houses by rhesus monkeys: the role of stimulus expertise and rotation angle.
    Parr LA; Heintz M
    Anim Cogn; 2008 Jul; 11(3):467-74. PubMed ID: 18256863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estradiol selectively affects processing of conspecifics' faces in female rhesus monkeys.
    Lacreuse A; Herndon JG
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2003 Oct; 28(7):885-905. PubMed ID: 12892656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perception of the Ponzo illusion by rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans: similarity and difference in the three primate species.
    Fujita K
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 9055623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Looking ahead? Computerized maze task performance by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella), and human children (Homo sapiens).
    Beran MJ; Parrish AE; Futch SE; Evans TA; Perdue BM
    J Comp Psychol; 2015 May; 129(2):160-73. PubMed ID: 25798793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The face inversion effect in non-human primates revisited - an investigation in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
    Dahl CD; Rasch MJ; Tomonaga M; Adachi I
    Sci Rep; 2013; 3():2504. PubMed ID: 23978930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seeing two faces together: preference formation in humans and rhesus macaques.
    Méary D; Li Z; Li W; Guo K; Pascalis O
    Anim Cogn; 2014 Sep; 17(5):1107-19. PubMed ID: 24638876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of face processing using scrambled faces.
    Taubert J; Aagten-Murphy D; Parr LA
    Perception; 2012; 41(4):460-73. PubMed ID: 22896918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.