188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21123309)
1. Hysterosalpingogram: an essential examination following Essure hysteroscopic sterilisation.
Shah V; Panay N; Williamson R; Hemingway A
Br J Radiol; 2011 Sep; 84(1005):805-12. PubMed ID: 21123309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography for Assessment of the Efficacy of Essure Hysteroscopic Sterilization.
Rosič M; Žegura B; Vadnjal Đonlagić S
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Aug; 37(8):1929-1935. PubMed ID: 29344973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Discordant relationship between Essure microinsert position and tubal occlusion.
Hou MY
BMJ Case Rep; 2016 Jul; 2016():. PubMed ID: 27466315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
Zizolfi B; Lazzeri L; Franchini M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nappi C; Piccione E; Exacoustos C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of tubal patency after essure placement.
Rodriguez AM; Kilic GS; Vu TP; Kuo YF; Breitkopf D; Snyder RR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 23541247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intraoperative Factors that Predict the Successful Placement of Essure Microinserts.
Arthuis CJ; Simon EG; Hébert T; Marret H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 28390945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Essure microinsert hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: eight-years follow-up results.
Sakinci M; Aksu T; Kuru O; Ozekinci M; Sanhal C
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2015; 42(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 25864287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Confirmation of Essure microinsert tubal coil placement with conventional and volume-contrast imaging three-dimensional ultrasound.
Thiel JA; Suchet IB; Lortie K
Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 16084897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast infusion sonography in the post-Essure setting.
Connor V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 18262145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Essure microinsert imaging: does abnormal shape on ultrasound predict complications on HSG?
VanBuren WM; Suchet IB; Thiel JA; Karreman E
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Dec; 41(12):2350-2358. PubMed ID: 27022912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hysteroscopic Sterilization Device Follow-Up Rate: Hysterosalpingogram Versus Transvaginal Ultrasound.
Jeirath N; Basinski CM; Hammond MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(5):836-841. PubMed ID: 29289623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Essure insert expulsion after 3-month hysterosalpingogram confirmation of bilateral tubal occlusion and bilateral correct placement: case report.
Garcia AL; Lewis RM; Sloan AL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 23312251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving Rates of Post-Essure Hysterosalpingography in an Urban Population Using Electronic Tracking Reminders.
Virginia Hu YH; Arora KS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):305-308. PubMed ID: 27867049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Essure Permanent Birth Control, Effectiveness and Safety: An Italian 11-Year Survey.
Franchini M; Zizolfi B; Coppola C; Bergamini V; Bonin C; Borsellino G; Busato E; Calabrese S; Calzolari S; Fantin GP; Giarrè G; Litta P; Luerti M; Mangino FP; Marchino GL; Molinari MA; Scatena E; Scrimin F; Telloli P; Di Spiezio Sardo A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(4):640-645. PubMed ID: 28232037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pre-hysterectomy assessment of immediate tubal occlusion with the third-generation ESSURE insert (ESS505).
Thiel J; Rattray D; Cher DJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1055-60. PubMed ID: 24861649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D ultrasound to assess the position of tubal sterilization microinserts.
Legendre G; Levaillant JM; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Gervaise A; Fernandez H
Hum Reprod; 2011 Oct; 26(10):2683-9. PubMed ID: 21846730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of three-dimensional ultrasound examination classification to check the position of the tubal sterilization microinsert.
Legendre G; Gervaise A; Levaillant JM; Faivre E; Deffieux X; Fernandez H
Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2732-5. PubMed ID: 20451183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Technique for the Laparoscopic Removal of Essure Microinserts.
Mahmoud MS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):472. PubMed ID: 26776673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation.
Sinha D; Kalathy V; Gupta JK; Clark TJ
BJOG; 2007 Jun; 114(6):676-83. PubMed ID: 17516957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound assessment of the Essure contraceptive devices: is three-dimensional ultrasound really needed?
Paladini D; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Coppola C; Zizolfi B; Pastore G; Nappi C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 25241073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
