BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21123857)

  • 21. Are you happy for me? How sharing positive events with others provides personal and interpersonal benefits.
    Reis HT; Smith SM; Carmichael CL; Caprariello PA; Tsai FF; Rodrigues A; Maniaci MR
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Aug; 99(2):311-29. PubMed ID: 20658846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. "If your feelings were hurt, I'm sorry…": How Third-Year Medical Students Observe, Learn From, and Engage in Apologies.
    Fischer IC; Frankel RM
    J Gen Intern Med; 2021 May; 36(5):1352-1358. PubMed ID: 33034017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of apologies and trait hostility on recovery from anger.
    Anderson JC; Linden W; Habra ME
    J Behav Med; 2006 Aug; 29(4):347-58. PubMed ID: 16845582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Belief in the malleability of groups strengthens the tenuous link between a collective apology and intergroup forgiveness.
    Wohl MJ; Cohen-Chen S; Halperin E; Caouette J; Hayes N; Hornsey MJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):714-25. PubMed ID: 25767157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Friend or foe: the effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making.
    van 't Wout M; Sanfey AG
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):796-803. PubMed ID: 18721917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Which type of leader do I support in step-level public good dilemmas? The roles of level of threshold and trust.
    De Cremer D
    Scand J Psychol; 2007 Feb; 48(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 17257369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The impact of mood on information use in judgments of relationship satisfaction.
    Conway M; Hassebrauck M
    Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 1997 Nov; 123(4):393-410. PubMed ID: 9431665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Experimental evidence that apologies promote forgiveness by communicating relationship value.
    Forster DE; Billingsley J; Burnette JL; Lieberman D; Ohtsubo Y; McCullough ME
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13107. PubMed ID: 34162912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. When perspective taking increases taking: reactive egoism in social interaction.
    Epley N; Caruso E; Bazerman MH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Nov; 91(5):872-89. PubMed ID: 17059307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Physician gender and apologies in clinical interactions.
    Hill KM; Blanch-Hartigan D
    Patient Educ Couns; 2018 May; 101(5):836-842. PubMed ID: 29241976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Silence speaks volumes: the effectiveness of reticence in comparison to apology and denial for responding to integrity- and competence-based trust violations.
    Ferrin DL; Kim PH; Cooper CD; Dirks KT
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Jul; 92(4):893-908. PubMed ID: 17638453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. My imagination versus your feelings: can personal affective forecasts be improved by knowing other peoples' emotions?
    Walsh E; Ayton P
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Dec; 15(4):351-60. PubMed ID: 20025420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sorry to ask but … how is apology effectiveness dependent on apology content and gender?
    Polin B; Doyle SP; Kim S; Lewicki RJ; Chawla N
    J Appl Psychol; 2024 Mar; 109(3):339-361. PubMed ID: 37856409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. You don't act like you trust me: dissociations between behavioural and explicit measures of source credibility judgement.
    Gordon R; Spears K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 21824016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Neural correlates of receiving an apology and active forgiveness: an FMRI study.
    Strang S; Utikal V; Fischbacher U; Weber B; Falk A
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e87654. PubMed ID: 24505303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes.
    Campbell L; Simpson JA; Boldry JG; Rubin H
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Jul; 99(1):14-31. PubMed ID: 20565183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Trust game reveals restricted interpersonal transactions in patients with borderline personality disorder.
    Unoka Z; Seres I; Aspán N; Bódi N; Kéri S
    J Pers Disord; 2009 Aug; 23(4):399-409. PubMed ID: 19663659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Getting off on the wrong foot: the timing of a breach and the restoration of trust.
    Lount RB; Zhong CB; Sivanathan N; Murnighan JK
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1601-12. PubMed ID: 19050335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Knowing too much: using private knowledge to predict how one is viewed by others.
    Chambers JR; Epley N; Savitsky K; Windschitl PD
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):542-8. PubMed ID: 18578843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. In Support of the Medical Apology: The Nonlegal Arguments.
    Heaton HA; Campbell RL; Thompson KM; Sadosty AT
    J Emerg Med; 2016 Nov; 51(5):605-609. PubMed ID: 27613450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.