These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21124120)

  • 1. Microsurgery trainer with quantitative feedback: a novel training tool for microvascular anastomosis and suggested training exercise.
    Kligman BE; Haddock NT; Garfein ES; Levine JP
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Dec; 126(6):328e-330e. PubMed ID: 21124120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and Evaluation of a Simulation Model for Microvascular Anastomosis Training.
    Willis RE; Wiersch J; Adams AJ; Al Fayyadh MJ; Weber RA; Wang HT
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2017 Sep; 33(7):493-501. PubMed ID: 28472839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microvascular training of medical students and surgeons - a comparative prospective study.
    Mücke T; Borgmann A; Ritschl LM; Kesting MR; Loeffelbein DJ; Wolff KD
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 41(8):e187-90. PubMed ID: 23402732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Achieving Microsurgical Competency in Orthopaedic Residents Utilizing a Self-Directed Microvascular Training Curriculum.
    Luther G; Blazar P; Dyer G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Feb; 101(3):e10. PubMed ID: 30730490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of microvascular anastomosis training in otolaryngology residencies: survey of United States program directors.
    Luginbuhl AJ; Pribitkin EA; Krein H; Heffelfinger RN
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 Nov; 143(5):633-6. PubMed ID: 20974331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of microvascular anastomosis training in otolaryngology residencies: survey of United States program directors.
    Luginbuhl A; Pribitkin E; Krein H; Heffelfinger R
    Laryngoscope; 2010; 120 Suppl 4():S233. PubMed ID: 21225831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of three-dimensional high-definition visualization technology to perform microvascular anastomosis.
    Wong AK; Davis GB; Nguyen TJ; Hui KJ; Hwang BH; Chan LS; Zhou Z; Schooler WG; Chandrasekhar BS; Urata MM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Jul; 67(7):967-72. PubMed ID: 24838275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Polypropylene background traction device for microvascular anastomosis.
    Ozdemir H; Sönmez E; Keçik A
    Microsurgery; 2010 Jul; 30(5):419-21. PubMed ID: 20058297
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The end game - A quantitative assessment tool for anastomosis in simulated microsurgery.
    Kim E; Norman ICF; Myers S; Singh M; Ghanem A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Jun; 73(6):1116-1121. PubMed ID: 32197885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel microsurgical anastomosis training model using gradually thawed cryopreserved microvessels of rat cadavers.
    Safi AF; Safi S; Tayeh M; Timmer M; Goldbrunner R; Kauke M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 46(7):1126-1131. PubMed ID: 29802058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microvascular Anastomosis: Proposition of a Learning Curve.
    Mokhtari P; Tayebi Meybodi A; Benet A; Lawton MT
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2019 Feb; 16(2):211-216. PubMed ID: 29669067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Prospective Study of Microvascular Anastomosis Training by Self-Learning or with Expert Instruction.
    Sakamoto Y; Okamoto S; Shimizu K; Araki Y; Hirakawa A; Wakabayashi T
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Oct; 118():e818-e824. PubMed ID: 30026155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Live Rat Femoral Artery Model with Intraoperative Microvascular Anastomosis.
    Schaverien MV; Butler CE; Suami H; Liu J; Selber JC
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2017 Nov; 33(9):641-648. PubMed ID: 28806848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-living microvascular training models: Face validity of liquid latex and the challenge of structural vs. "physiological" patency assessment.
    Pafitanis G; Veljanoski D; Suciu CO; Ghanem AM; Myers S
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Jan; 71(1):53-54. PubMed ID: 28864314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a task-specific scoring system for a microvascular surgery simulation model.
    Nimmons GL; Chang KE; Funk GF; Shonka DC; Pagedar NA
    Laryngoscope; 2012 Oct; 122(10):2164-8. PubMed ID: 22961593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Description and implementation of an ex vivo simulator kit for developing microsurgery skills.
    Soto-Miranda MA; Ver Halen JP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014; 72(6):S208-12. PubMed ID: 24691333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A New Synthetic Model for Microvascular Anastomosis Training? A Randomized Comparative Study Between Silicone and Polyvinyl Alcohol Gelatin Tubes.
    Atlan M; Lellouch AG; Legagneux J; Chaouat M; Masquelet AC; Letourneur D
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(1):182-187. PubMed ID: 28673805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anastomosis Lapse Index (ALI): A Validated End Product Assessment Tool for Simulation Microsurgery Training.
    Ghanem AM; Al Omran Y; Shatta B; Kim E; Myers S
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2016 Mar; 32(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 26645156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microsurgery Workout: A Novel Simulation Training Curriculum Based on Nonliving Models.
    Rodriguez JR; Yañez R; Cifuentes I; Varas J; Dagnino B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Oct; 138(4):739e-747e. PubMed ID: 27673544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microvascular anastomosis simulation using a chicken thigh model: Interval versus massed training.
    Schoeff S; Hernandez B; Robinson DJ; Jameson MJ; Shonka DC
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Nov; 127(11):2490-2494. PubMed ID: 28407264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.