259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21124283)
1. Embolic protection in carotid artery stenting: "a no-brainer"?
Macdonald S
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2010 Dec; 51(6):861-4. PubMed ID: 21124283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A Prospective, Multicenter Study of a Novel Mesh-Covered Carotid Stent: The CGuard CARENET Trial (Carotid Embolic Protection Using MicroNet).
Schofer J; Musiałek P; Bijuklic K; Kolvenbach R; Trystula M; Siudak Z; Sievert H
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 8(9):1229-1234. PubMed ID: 26292586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Technique and clinical evidence of neuroprotection in carotid artery stenting.
Knur R
Vasa; 2014 Mar; 43(2):100-12. PubMed ID: 24627316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Role of Embolic Protection in Carotid Stenting Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases (PCVD).
Kobayashi T; Giri J
Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 2017; 59(6):612-618. PubMed ID: 28372946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distal cerebral protection device filled with calcified plaque debris after carotid stenting.
Velasco A; Mosimann PJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Apr; 6(4):e22-3. PubMed ID: 23597618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Randomized clinical trial of open-cell vs closed-cell stents for carotid stenting and effects of stent design on cerebral embolization.
Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Higuera A; Ilarraza A; Modrall JG; Clagett GP
J Vasc Surg; 2011 Nov; 54(5):1310-1316.e1; discussion 1316. PubMed ID: 21723064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New technologies for CAS that might overcome the burden of microembolization.
Yamada R; Guimaraes M; Adams J; Schönholz C
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2015 Dec; 56(6):859-65. PubMed ID: 26173393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF Study.
Pinter L; Ribo M; Loh C; Lane B; Roberts T; Chou TM; Kolvenbach RR
J Vasc Surg; 2011 Nov; 54(5):1317-23. PubMed ID: 21658889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence overview: benefit of cerebral protection devices during carotid artery stenting.
Vos JA
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Apr; 58(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 28004899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An update on the role of proximal occlusion devices in carotid artery stenting.
Kassavin DS; Clair DG
J Vasc Surg; 2017 Jan; 65(1):271-275. PubMed ID: 27876518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of reverse flow as a means of cerebral protection during carotid artery stent placement with diffusion-weighted and transcranial Doppler imaging.
Goode SD; Hoggard N; Macdonald S; Evans DH; Cleveland TJ; Gaines PA
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):528-33. PubMed ID: 23462063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cerebral embolic lesions detected with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging following carotid artery stenting: a meta-analysis of 8 studies comparing filter cerebral protection and proximal balloon occlusion.
Stabile E; Sannino A; Schiattarella GG; Gargiulo G; Toscano E; Brevetti L; Scudiero F; Giugliano G; Perrino C; Trimarco B; Esposito G
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Oct; 7(10):1177-83. PubMed ID: 25240544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New embolic protection devices: a review.
Macdonald S
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2011 Dec; 52(6):821-7. PubMed ID: 22051990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discussion. Risk factors for atherosclerotic plaque embolization.
Lin PH
J Vasc Surg; 2010 Nov; 52(5):1194-5. PubMed ID: 20655688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Update on new stents and protection devices for carotid artery stenting: what we know, what we learnt recently and what we need to know.
Nikas DN; Makos X; Umemoto T; Liappas G; Pacchioni A; Zakarian N; Reimers B
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2017 Feb; 58(1):13-24. PubMed ID: 27922252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cerebral protection devices reduce periprocedural strokes during carotid angioplasty and stenting: a systematic review of the current literature.
Garg N; Karagiorgos N; Pisimisis GT; Sohal DP; Longo GM; Johanning JM; Lynch TG; Pipinos II
J Endovasc Ther; 2009 Aug; 16(4):412-27. PubMed ID: 19702342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The type of embolic protection does not influence the outcome in carotid artery stenting.
Iyer V; de Donato G; Deloose K; Peeters P; Castriota F; Cremonesi A; Setacci C; Bosiers M
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 17664102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is there evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Clinical data.
Schonholz CJ; Uflacker R; Parodi JC; Hannegan C; Selby B
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2006 Apr; 47(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 16572087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. FiberNet--a new embolic protection device for carotid artery stenting.
Bauer C; Franke J; Bertog SC; Woerner V; Ghasemzadeh-Asl S; Sievert H
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 83(6):1014-20. PubMed ID: 23900978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The history of proximal carotid protection and flow reversal to prevent stent angioplasty embolization.
Parodi J; Bates MC; Ohki T; Schönholz C
Semin Vasc Surg; 2018 Mar; 31(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 29891030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
