These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21124945)

  • 1. Using sequence-specific chemical and structural properties of DNA to predict transcription factor binding sites.
    Bauer AL; Hlavacek WS; Unkefer PJ; Mu F
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Nov; 6(11):e1001007. PubMed ID: 21124945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved predictions of transcription factor binding sites using physicochemical features of DNA.
    Maienschein-Cline M; Dinner AR; Hlavacek WS; Mu F
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2012 Dec; 40(22):e175. PubMed ID: 22923524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High resolution models of transcription factor-DNA affinities improve in vitro and in vivo binding predictions.
    Agius P; Arvey A; Chang W; Noble WS; Leslie C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2010 Sep; 6(9):. PubMed ID: 20838582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Conformational model for binding site recognition by the E.coli MetJ transcription factor.
    Liu R; Blackwell TW; States DJ
    Bioinformatics; 2001 Jul; 17(7):622-33. PubMed ID: 11448880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sequence features of DNA binding sites reveal structural class of associated transcription factor.
    Narlikar L; Hartemink AJ
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 22(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 16267080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. dPeak: high resolution identification of transcription factor binding sites from PET and SET ChIP-Seq data.
    Chung D; Park D; Myers K; Grass J; Kiley P; Landick R; Keleş S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(10):e1003246. PubMed ID: 24146601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ChIPulate: A comprehensive ChIP-seq simulation pipeline.
    Datta V; Hannenhalli S; Siddharthan R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Mar; 15(3):e1006921. PubMed ID: 30897079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative modeling of transcription factor binding specificities using DNA shape.
    Zhou T; Shen N; Yang L; Abe N; Horton J; Mann RS; Bussemaker HJ; Gordân R; Rohs R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Apr; 112(15):4654-9. PubMed ID: 25775564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Better estimation of protein-DNA interaction parameters improve prediction of functional sites.
    Nagaraj VH; O'Flanagan RA; Sengupta AM
    BMC Biotechnol; 2008 Dec; 8():94. PubMed ID: 19105805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A biophysical model for analysis of transcription factor interaction and binding site arrangement from genome-wide binding data.
    He X; Chen CC; Hong F; Fang F; Sinha S; Ng HH; Zhong S
    PLoS One; 2009 Dec; 4(12):e8155. PubMed ID: 19956545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predicting transcription factor specificity with all-atom models.
    Rahi SJ; Virnau P; Mirny LA; Kardar M
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Nov; 36(19):6209-17. PubMed ID: 18829719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A feature-based approach to modeling protein-DNA interactions.
    Sharon E; Lubliner S; Segal E
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2008 Aug; 4(8):e1000154. PubMed ID: 18725950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Learning position weight matrices from sequence and expression data.
    Chen X; Guo L; Fan Z; Jiang T
    Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf; 2007; 6():249-60. PubMed ID: 17951829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contribution of Sequence Motif, Chromatin State, and DNA Structure Features to Predictive Models of Transcription Factor Binding in Yeast.
    Tsai ZT; Shiu SH; Tsai HK
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004418. PubMed ID: 26291518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Molecular and structural considerations of TF-DNA binding for the generation of biologically meaningful and accurate phylogenetic footprinting analysis: the LysR-type transcriptional regulator family as a study model.
    Oliver P; Peralta-Gil M; Tabche ML; Merino E
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):686. PubMed ID: 27567672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the model transferability for prediction of transcription factor binding sites based on chromatin accessibility.
    Liu S; Zibetti C; Wan J; Wang G; Blackshaw S; Qian J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jul; 18(1):355. PubMed ID: 28750606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancing the prediction of transcription factor binding sites by incorporating structural properties and nucleotide covariations.
    Gunewardena S; Jeavons P; Zhang Z
    J Comput Biol; 2006 May; 13(4):929-45. PubMed ID: 16761919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An efficient method to transcription factor binding sites imputation via simultaneous completion of multiple matrices with positional consistency.
    Guo WL; Huang DS
    Mol Biosyst; 2017 Aug; 13(9):1827-1837. PubMed ID: 28718849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nucleoid-Associated Proteins: Genome Level Occupancy and Expression Analysis.
    Singh P; Seshasayee ASN
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1624():85-97. PubMed ID: 28842878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative analysis of methods for representing and searching for transcription factor binding sites.
    Osada R; Zaslavsky E; Singh M
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Dec; 20(18):3516-25. PubMed ID: 15297295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.