BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21128191)

  • 1. Development and testing of a more realistic pelvis for the Hybrid III 6-year-old ATD.
    Klinich KD; Reed MP; Manary MA; Orton NR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2010 Dec; 11(6):606-12. PubMed ID: 21128191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kinematics of pediatric crash dummies seated on vehicle seats with realistic belt geometry.
    Klinich KD; Reed MP; Ebert SM; Rupp JD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15(8):866-74. PubMed ID: 24884476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Kinetic and kinematic responses of post mortem human surrogates and the Hybrid III ATD in high-speed frontal sled tests.
    Beeman SM; Kemper AR; Madigan ML; Duma SM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jun; 55():34-47. PubMed ID: 23507433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of THOR and Hybrid III dummy lower neck loads to belt systems in frontal impact.
    Yoganandan N; Pintar FA; Moore J; Maiman DJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Feb; 12(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21259178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Large Omnidirectional Child (LODC) ATD: Biofidelity Comparison with the Hybrid III 10 Year Old.
    Stammen J; Moorhouse K; Suntay B; Carlson M; Kang YS
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2016 Nov; 60():581-623. PubMed ID: 27871107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of a three-year-old child FE model.
    Mizuno K; Iwata K; Deguchi T; Ikami T; Kubota M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Dec; 6(4):361-71. PubMed ID: 16266945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of pediatric wheelchair kinematics and wheelchair tiedown and occupant restraint system loading during rear impact.
    Fuhrman SI; Karg P; Bertocci G
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Apr; 32(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 19398366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simulation study of spine biofidelity in the hybrid-III 6-year-old ATD.
    Wu J; Cao L; Reed MP; Hu J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 23531263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of child restraint misuse on dynamic performance.
    Manary MA; Flannagan CAC; Reed MP; Orton NR; Klinich KD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):860-865. PubMed ID: 31670975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variations in rear seat cushion properties and the effects on submarining.
    Beck B; Brown J; Bilston LE
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Feb; 12(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 21259174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved positioning procedures for 6YO and 10YO ATDs based on child occupant postures.
    Reed MP; Ebert-Hamilton SM; Manary MA; Klinich KD; Schneider LW
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2006 Nov; 50():337-88. PubMed ID: 17311170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Child safety in vehicles: validation of a mathematical model and development of restraint system design guidelines for 3-year-olds through mathematical simulations.
    Johansson M; Pipkorn B; Lövsund P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Oct; 10(5):467-78. PubMed ID: 19746311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamic frontal crash performance of old and used child restraint systems.
    Whyte T; Kent N; Griffiths M; Bilston LE; Brown J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(7):570-575. PubMed ID: 34432557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anthropometric specification of child crash dummy pelves through statistical analysis of skeletal geometry.
    Reed MP; Sochor MM; Rupp JD; Klinich KD; Manary MA
    J Biomech; 2009 May; 42(8):1143-5. PubMed ID: 19356764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restraints and occupant kinematics in vehicular rollovers.
    Meyer SE; Herbst B; Forrest S; Syson SR; Sances A; Kumaresan S
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2002; 38():465-9. PubMed ID: 12085651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Making the most of the worst-case scenario: should belt-positioning booster seats be used in lap-belt-only seating positions?
    Kirley BB; Teoh ER; Lund AK; Arbogast KB; Kallan MJ; Durbin DR
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2009 Dec; 10(6):580-3. PubMed ID: 19916129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of three-point belt fit between humans and ATDs in rear seats.
    Park J; Ebert SM; Reed MP; Hallman JJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S65-S69. PubMed ID: 29584500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numerical simulation of a child restraint system in an aircraft crash-test.
    Oggero E; Pipino M; Deweese R; Mugnai A; Aljundi B; Pagnacco G
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2000; 36():257-62. PubMed ID: 10834242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the static belt fit provided by belt-positioning booster seats.
    Reed MP; Ebert SM; Sherwood CP; Klinich KD; Manary MA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2009 May; 41(3):598-607. PubMed ID: 19393812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The frontal-impact response of a booster-seated child-size PMHS.
    Lopez-Valdes FJ; Forman J; Bostrom O; Kent R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2010 Jun; 11(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 20544577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.