These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

44 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2112863)

  • 1. Optical spectroscopy (INVOS) is unreliable in detecting breast cancer.
    Bosanko CM; Baum JK; Clark K; Barth-Jones D; Levine AJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Jul; 155(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 2112863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
    Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
    Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Magnetic resonance imaging of the human female breast. Current status and pathologic correlations.
    Powell DE; Stelling CB
    Pathol Annu; 1988; 23 Pt 1():159-94. PubMed ID: 2838793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stereotactic core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions using a conventional mammography unit with an add-on device.
    Kirshenbaum KJ; Voruganti T; Overbeeke C; Kirshenbaum MD; Patel P; Kaplan G; Maker V; August C; Cavallino RP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):527-31. PubMed ID: 12876040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography-guided stereotactic fine-needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions: prospective comparison with surgical biopsy results.
    Fajardo LL; Davis JR; Wiens JL; Trego DC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Nov; 155(5):977-81. PubMed ID: 2120967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of mammographic breast lesions with Tc-99m sestamibi scintimammography and contrast enhanced MRI.
    Sommer H; Tiling R; Pechmann M; Kindermann G; Kress K; Moser R; Tatsch K; Hahn K; Pfluger T; Assemi C
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1997; 119(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 9050197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography.
    Drukker K; Horsch K; Giger ML
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):970-9. PubMed ID: 16087091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [High-risk focal breast lesions in echography and mammography].
    Gozzi G; Delendi M; Bazzocchi M; Zuiani C; Vasciaveo A; Ferrara P
    Radiol Med; 1989 Dec; 78(6):603-6. PubMed ID: 2697029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast disease.
    Dash N; Lupetin AR; Daffner RH; Deeb ZL; Sefczek RJ; Schapiro RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jan; 146(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 3484399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lehman CD; Blume JD; Weatherall P; Thickman D; Hylton N; Warner E; Pisano E; Schnitt SJ; Gatsonis C; Schnall M; DeAngelis GA; Stomper P; Rosen EL; O'Loughlin M; Harms S; Bluemke DA;
    Cancer; 2005 May; 103(9):1898-905. PubMed ID: 15800894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Usefulness of serum CA-15.3 in the management of benign breast lesion.
    Mondal HP; Roy H; Mondal P; Saha M; Basu N
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2012 Apr; 110(4):242-4. PubMed ID: 23025224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The validity of complex breast cysts after surgery.
    Tea MK; Grimm C; Fink-Retter A; Bikas D; Kroiss R; Kubista E; Wagner T
    Am J Surg; 2009 Feb; 197(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 18649871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What ultrasonography can tell in breast masses that mammography and physical examination cannot.
    Rosner D; Blaird D
    J Surg Oncol; 1985 Apr; 28(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 3884906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optical spectroscopy. Pre-mammography marker.
    Egan RL; Dolan PD
    Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 3048345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determining sensitivity of mammography from screening data, cancer incidence, and receiver-operating characteristic curve parameters.
    Boone JM; Lindfors KK; Seibert JA
    Med Decis Making; 2002; 22(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 12058780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detection of breast abnormalities using a prototype resonance electrical impedance spectroscopy system: a preliminary study.
    Zheng B; Zuley ML; Sumkin JH; Catullo VJ; Abrams GS; Rathfon GY; Chough DM; Gruss MZ; Gur D
    Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3041-8. PubMed ID: 18697526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo optical spectroscopy monitoring in a new model of muscular compartment syndrome.
    Forget P; Ponchon F; Vanhoonacker M; Stoquart GG; Lejeune TM; Lois F; Kahn D; Schils JL; De Kock M
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 Oct; 109(4):561-5. PubMed ID: 22763805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Failure to detect early breast cancer using in vitro nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of plasma.
    Holmberg L; Jakobsson U; Berglund A; Adami HO
    Br J Cancer; 1993 Aug; 68(2):389-92. PubMed ID: 8347495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammographic reports and surgical referrals.
    Hall FM
    Radiology; 1989 Jun; 171(3):876. PubMed ID: 2717772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.