252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21128848)
1. The validity and reliability of diagnosing foot ulcers and pre-ulcerative lesions in diabetes using advanced digital photography.
Hazenberg CE; van Baal JG; Manning E; Bril A; Bus SA
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Dec; 12(12):1011-7. PubMed ID: 21128848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of signs of foot infection in diabetes patients using photographic foot imaging and infrared thermography.
Hazenberg CE; van Netten JJ; van Baal SG; Bus SA
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Jun; 16(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 24690146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of foot disease in the home environment of diabetic patients using a new photographic foot imaging device.
Bus SA; Hazenberg CE; Klein M; Van Baal JG
J Med Eng Technol; 2010 Jan; 34(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 19951011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The association between callus formation, high pressures and neuropathy in diabetic foot ulceration.
Murray HJ; Young MJ; Hollis S; Boulton AJ
Diabet Med; 1996 Nov; 13(11):979-82. PubMed ID: 8946157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Photographic foot scanner for the early diagnosis of diabetic foot].
Bus SA; Hazenberg CE; van Baal JG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2010; 154():A2238. PubMed ID: 20977813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds.
Thompson N; Gordey L; Bowles H; Parslow N; Houghton P
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Aug; 26(8):360-73. PubMed ID: 23860221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Telemedical home-monitoring of diabetic foot disease using photographic foot imaging--a feasibility study.
Hazenberg CE; Bus SA; Kottink AI; Bouwmans CA; Schönbach-Spraul AM; van Baal SG
J Telemed Telecare; 2012 Jan; 18(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 22067285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of callosities on the magnitude and duration of plantar pressure in patients with diabetes mellitus. A callus may cause 18,600 kilograms of excess plantar pressure per day.
Pataky Z; Golay A; Faravel L; Da Silva J; Makoundou V; Peter-Riesch B; Assal JP
Diabetes Metab; 2002 Nov; 28(5):356-61. PubMed ID: 12461472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tool for Rapid & Easy Identification of High Risk Diabetic Foot: Validation & Clinical Pilot of the Simplified 60 Second Diabetic Foot Screening Tool.
Woodbury MG; Sibbald RG; Ostrow B; Persaud R; Lowe JM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0125578. PubMed ID: 26121258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The reproducibility of acquiring three dimensional gait and plantar pressure data using established protocols in participants with and without type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers.
Fernando M; Crowther RG; Cunningham M; Lazzarini PA; Sangla KS; Buttner P; Golledge J
J Foot Ankle Res; 2016; 9():4. PubMed ID: 26834842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of single-field digital fundus images for diabetic retinopathy screening.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Teerasuwanajak K; Tiensuwan M; Yuttitham K;
Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):826-32. PubMed ID: 16650679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity of Diagnosis of Superficial Infection of Laparotomy Wounds Using Digital Photography: Inter- and Intra-observer Agreement Among Surgeons.
van Ramshorst GH; Vrijland W; van der Harst E; Hop WC; den Hartog D; Lange JF
Wounds; 2010 Feb; 22(2):38-43. PubMed ID: 25901725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of a new imaging device for telemedical ulcer monitoring.
Rasmussen BS; Froekjaer J; Joergensen LB; Halekoh U; Yderstraede KB
Skin Res Technol; 2015 Nov; 21(4):485-92. PubMed ID: 25801649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of at-home infrared temperature monitoring in reducing the incidence of foot ulcer recurrence in patients with diabetes (DIATEMP): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Aan de Stegge WB; Mejaiti N; van Netten JJ; Dijkgraaf MGW; van Baal JG; Busch-Westbroek TE; Bus SA
Trials; 2018 Sep; 19(1):520. PubMed ID: 30249296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing the diabetic foot: plantar callus and pressure sensation.
Collier JH; Brodbeck CA
Diabetes Educ; 1993; 19(6):503-8. PubMed ID: 8156863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter- and intra-examiner reliability of footprint pattern analysis obtained from diabetics using the Harris mat.
Cisneros Lde L; Fonseca TH; Abreu VC
Rev Bras Fisioter; 2010; 14(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 20730363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital Photography: a Tool for Nursing on the Assessment of Pressure Lesions.
Cortés OL; Alvarado PA; Rojas YA; Salazar LD; Acuña X; Esparza M
Invest Educ Enferm; 2018 May; 36(2):. PubMed ID: 30148941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Examiner reliability in fluorosis scoring: a comparison of photographic and clinical methods.
Mohd Nor NA; Chestnuttl IG; Chadwick BL
Community Dent Health; 2016 Jun; 33(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 27352470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
