254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21128848)
21. Clinical photographic observation of plantar corns and callus associated with a nominal scale classification and inter- observer reliability study in a student population.
Tollafield DR
J Foot Ankle Res; 2017; 10():45. PubMed ID: 29046725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ultrasonographic and thermographic screening for latent inflammation in diabetic foot callus.
Nishide K; Nagase T; Oba M; Oe M; Ohashi Y; Iizaka S; Nakagami G; Kadowaki T; Sanada H
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2009 Sep; 85(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 19586674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.
Houghton PE; Kincaid CB; Campbell KE; Woodbury MG; Keast DH
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Apr; 46(4):20-6, 28-30. PubMed ID: 10788924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Concurrent Validity, Test-Retest Reliability and Usability of a New Foot Temperature Monitoring System for Persons with Diabetes at High Risk of Foot Ulceration.
Veneman T; Schaper NC; Bus SA
Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(11):. PubMed ID: 34073853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Staging and defining characteristics of pressure ulcers using photographs by staff nurses in acute care settings.
Jesada EC; Warren JI; Goodman D; Iliuta RW; Thurkauf G; McLaughlin MK; Johnson JE; Strassner L
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2013; 40(2):150-6. PubMed ID: 23466719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reliability of a novel thermal imaging system for temperature assessment of healthy feet.
Petrova NL; Whittam A; MacDonald A; Ainarkar S; Donaldson AN; Bevans J; Allen J; Plassmann P; Kluwe B; Ring F; Rogers L; Simpson R; Machin G; Edmonds ME
J Foot Ankle Res; 2018; 11():22. PubMed ID: 29854007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Remote monitoring of clubfoot treatment with digital photographs in low resource settings: Is it accurate?
Smythe T; Nogaro MC; Clifton LJ; Mudariki D; Theologis T; Lavy C
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0232878. PubMed ID: 32413066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The validity and reliability of remote diabetic foot ulcer assessment using mobile phone images.
van Netten JJ; Clark D; Lazzarini PA; Janda M; Reed LF
Sci Rep; 2017 Aug; 7(1):9480. PubMed ID: 28842686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Knowledge of the Warning Signs of Foot Ulcer Deterioration Among Patients With Diabetes.
Chin YF; Yeh JT; Yu HY; Weng LC
J Nurs Res; 2018 Dec; 26(6):420-426. PubMed ID: 30395022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prevention and management of diabetic foot ulcers.
Turns M
Br J Community Nurs; 2015 Mar; Suppl Wound Care():S30, S32, S34-7. PubMed ID: 25757381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Interobserver Reliability of Three Validated Scoring Systems in the Assessment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
Forsythe RO; Ozdemir BA; Chemla ES; Jones KG; Hinchliffe RJ
Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2016 Sep; 15(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 27358037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Telemedical diagnosis of anterior segment eye diseases: validation of digital slit-lamp still images.
Kumar S; Yogesan K; Constable IJ
Eye (Lond); 2009 Mar; 23(3):652-60. PubMed ID: 18274557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of the clinical age-related maculopathy staging system.
Seddon JM; Sharma S; Adelman RA
Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):260-6. PubMed ID: 16458093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The use of medical hyperspectral technology to evaluate microcirculatory changes in diabetic foot ulcers and to predict clinical outcomes.
Khaodhiar L; Dinh T; Schomacker KT; Panasyuk SV; Freeman JE; Lew R; Vo T; Panasyuk AA; Lima C; Giurini JM; Lyons TE; Veves A
Diabetes Care; 2007 Apr; 30(4):903-10. PubMed ID: 17303790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Xerosis and callus formation as a key to the diabetic foot syndrome: dermatologic view of the problem and its management.
Pavicic T; Korting HC
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges; 2006 Nov; 4(11):935-41. PubMed ID: 17081268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Diagnosing the severity of buccal caries lesions in orthodontic patients at de-bonding using digital photographs.
Almosa NA; Lundgren T; Bresin A; Birkhed D; Kjellberg H
Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Aug; 72(6):474-80. PubMed ID: 24320004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Variations of plantar thermographic patterns in normal controls and non-ulcer diabetic patients: novel classification using angiosome concept.
Nagase T; Sanada H; Takehara K; Oe M; Iizaka S; Ohashi Y; Oba M; Kadowaki T; Nakagami G
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2011 Jul; 64(7):860-6. PubMed ID: 21257357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of GDx VCC, HRT I, and clinical assessment of stereoscopic optic nerve head photographs for diagnosing glaucoma.
Reus NJ; de Graaf M; Lemij HG
Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 91(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 17035283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of smartphone attached mobile thermography assessing subclinical inflammation: a pilot study.
Kanazawa T; Nakagami G; Goto T; Noguchi H; Oe M; Miyagaki T; Hayashi A; Sasaki S; Sanada H
J Wound Care; 2016 Apr; 25(4):177-80, 182. PubMed ID: 27064366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validity and reliability of Chinese version of the new diabetic foot ulcer assessment scale.
Luo Y; Mai L; Liu X; Yang C
Int Wound J; 2023 Nov; 20(9):3724-3730. PubMed ID: 37264728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]