These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21129972)

  • 21. On the Coyne and Orr-igin of species: effects of intrinsic postzygotic isolation, ecological differentiation, x chromosome size, and sympatry on Drosophila speciation.
    Turelli M; Lipkowitz JR; Brandvain Y
    Evolution; 2014 Apr; 68(4):1176-87. PubMed ID: 24325145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila.
    Noor MA
    Nature; 1995 Jun; 375(6533):674-5. PubMed ID: 7791899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A biogeographic genetic approach for testing the role of reinforcement: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Kulathinal RJ; Singh RS
    Evolution; 2000 Feb; 54(1):210-7. PubMed ID: 10937197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sexual isolation between two sibling species with overlapping ranges: Drosophila santomea and Drosophila yakuba.
    Coyne JA; Kim SY; Chang AS; Lachaise D; Elwyn S
    Evolution; 2002 Dec; 56(12):2424-34. PubMed ID: 12583583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rapid and Predictable Evolution of Admixed Populations Between Two
    Matute DR; Comeault AA; Earley E; Serrato-Capuchina A; Peede D; Monroy-Eklund A; Huang W; Jones CD; Mackay TFC; Coyne JA
    Genetics; 2020 Jan; 214(1):211-230. PubMed ID: 31767631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sexual and postmating reproductive isolation between allopatric Drosophila montana populations suggest speciation potential.
    Jennings JH; Mazzi D; Ritchie MG; Hoikkala A
    BMC Evol Biol; 2011 Mar; 11():68. PubMed ID: 21396136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Species coexist more easily if reinforcement is based on habitat preferences than on species recognition.
    Kyogoku D; Kokko H
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 Nov; 89(11):2605-2616. PubMed ID: 32799334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Noisy neighbors can hamper the evolution of reproductive isolation by reinforcing selection.
    Matute DR
    Am Nat; 2015 Feb; 185(2):253-69. PubMed ID: 25616143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The genetic basis of behavioral isolation between Drosophila mauritiana and D. sechellia.
    McNabney DR
    Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2182-90. PubMed ID: 22759294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ecological speciation in an island snail: evidence for the parallel evolution of a novel ecotype and maintenance by ecologically dependent postzygotic isolation.
    Stankowski S
    Mol Ecol; 2013 May; 22(10):2726-41. PubMed ID: 23506623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [What's wrong with "development of isolating mechanisms" (and its special case in form of "reinforcement")?].
    Fridman VS
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2014; 75(4):261-86. PubMed ID: 25786309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genetic divergence and the number of hybridizing species affect the path to homoploid hybrid speciation.
    Comeault AA; Matute DR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Sep; 115(39):9761-9766. PubMed ID: 30209213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Genetic differentiation and adaptive evolution at reproductive loci in incipient Drosophila species.
    Almeida FC; DeSalle R
    J Evol Biol; 2017 Mar; 30(3):524-537. PubMed ID: 27883252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patterns of gene flow and selection across multiple species of Acrocephalus warblers: footprints of parallel selection on the Z chromosome.
    Reifová R; Majerová V; Reif J; Ahola M; Lindholm A; Procházka P
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 16(1):130. PubMed ID: 27311647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Patterns of reproductive isolation in a haplodiploid - strong post-mating, prezygotic barriers among three forms of a social spider mite.
    Sato Y; Sakamoto H; Gotoh T; Saito Y; Chao JT; Egas M; Mochizuki A
    J Evol Biol; 2018 Jun; 31(6):866-881. PubMed ID: 29569309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conflict over fertilization underlies the transient evolution of reinforcement.
    Rushworth CA; Wardlaw AM; Ross-Ibarra J; Brandvain Y
    PLoS Biol; 2022 Oct; 20(10):e3001814. PubMed ID: 36228022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hybridization and speciation.
    Abbott R; Albach D; Ansell S; Arntzen JW; Baird SJ; Bierne N; Boughman J; Brelsford A; Buerkle CA; Buggs R; Butlin RK; Dieckmann U; Eroukhmanoff F; Grill A; Cahan SH; Hermansen JS; Hewitt G; Hudson AG; Jiggins C; Jones J; Keller B; Marczewski T; Mallet J; Martinez-Rodriguez P; Möst M; Mullen S; Nichols R; Nolte AW; Parisod C; Pfennig K; Rice AM; Ritchie MG; Seifert B; Smadja CM; Stelkens R; Szymura JM; Väinölä R; Wolf JB; Zinner D
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Feb; 26(2):229-46. PubMed ID: 23323997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reinforced postmating reproductive isolation barriers in Neurospora, an Ascomycete microfungus.
    Turner E; Jacobson DJ; Taylor JW
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Aug; 23(8):1642-56. PubMed ID: 20546092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reinforcement as an initiator of population divergence and speciation.
    Pfennig KS
    Curr Zool; 2016 Apr; 62(2):145-154. PubMed ID: 29491902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Coupling, Reinforcement, and Speciation.
    Butlin RK; Smadja CM
    Am Nat; 2018 Feb; 191(2):155-172. PubMed ID: 29351021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.