BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

850 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21130318)

  • 1. Numeric simulations of en-masse space closure with sliding mechanics.
    Kojima Y; Fukui H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):702.e1-6; discussion 702-4. PubMed ID: 21130318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
    Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimal loading conditions for controlled movement of anterior teeth in sliding mechanics.
    Tominaga JY; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Gonzales C; Kobayashi M; Yoshida N
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1102-7. PubMed ID: 19852600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Finite element analysis of the effect of force directions on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics.
    Kojima Y; Kawamura J; Fukui H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 22999674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of bracket slot and archwire dimensions on anterior tooth movement during space closure in sliding mechanics: a 3-dimensional finite element study.
    Tominaga JY; Ozaki H; Chiang PC; Sumi M; Tanaka M; Koga Y; Bourauel C; Yoshida N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 25085299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimum conditions for parallel translation of maxillary anterior teeth under retraction force determined with the finite element method.
    Kim T; Suh J; Kim N; Lee M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):639-47. PubMed ID: 20451783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
    Hedayati Z; Shomali M
    Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 3D FEM comparison of lingual and labial orthodontics in en masse retraction.
    Lombardo L; Scuzzo G; Arreghini A; Gorgun O; Ortan YO; Siciliani G
    Prog Orthod; 2014 May; 15(1):38. PubMed ID: 24950350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Maxillary posterior intrusion mechanics with mini-implant anchorage evaluated with the finite element method.
    Çifter M; Saraç M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e233-41. PubMed ID: 22051501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modified sliding mechanics in extraction cases with a bidimensional approach.
    Giancotti A; Greco M
    Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 20974453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numerical simulation of canine retraction by sliding mechanics.
    Kojima Y; Fukui H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 May; 127(5):542-51. PubMed ID: 15877034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mandibular canine intrusion with the segmented arch technique: A finite element method study.
    Caballero GM; Carvalho Filho OA; Hargreaves BO; Brito HH; Magalhães Júnior PA; Oliveira DD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 26038072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element analysis of the effect of power arm locations on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew anchorage in customized lingual orthodontic treatment.
    Feng Y; Kong WD; Cen WJ; Zhou XZ; Zhang W; Li QT; Guo HY; Yu JW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):210-219. PubMed ID: 31375231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mandibular anterior intrusion using miniscrews for skeletal anchorage: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    González Del Castillo McGrath M; Araujo-Monsalvo VM; Murayama N; Martínez-Cruz M; Justus-Doczi R; Domínguez-Hernández VM; Ondarza-Rovira R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):469-476. PubMed ID: 30268257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of Skeletally Supported Anterior en Masse Retraction with Varied Lever Arm Lengths and Locations in Lingual Orthodontic Treatment: A 3D Finite Element Study.
    Ghannam M; Kamiloğlu B
    Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():9975428. PubMed ID: 34056005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
    Ammar HH; Ngan P; Crout RJ; Mucino VH; Mukdadi OM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental determination of optimal force system required for control of anterior tooth movement in sliding mechanics.
    Sia S; Shibazaki T; Koga Y; Yoshida N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19121498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Numerical simulations of canine retraction with T-loop springs based on the updated moment-to-force ratio.
    Kojima Y; Fukui H
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 21135033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Torque control in lingual orthodontics with lever arm mechanics: a case report.
    Aravind M; Shivaprakash G; Ramesh GC
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e186-96. PubMed ID: 23646329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 43.