These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21130581)

  • 41. Uncalibrated radial and femoral arterial pressure waveform analysis for continuous cardiac output measurement: an evaluation in cardiac surgery patients.
    Hofer CK; Button D; Weibel L; Genoni M; Zollinger A
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2010 Apr; 24(2):257-64. PubMed ID: 19700349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [National experts consensus on application of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technique in severe burn treatment (2018 version)].
    ; Zhang WY; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 Nov; 34(11):E005. PubMed ID: 30440147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Noninvasive haemodynamic monitoring using finger arterial pressure waveforms.
    de Jong RM; Westerhof BE; Voors AA; van Veldhuisen DJ
    Neth J Med; 2009 Dec; 67(11):372-5. PubMed ID: 20009113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Cardiac output and left atrial pressure monitoring by right ventricular pressure waveform analysis for potential implantable device application.
    Xu D; Olivier NB; Mukkamala R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Sep; 56(9):2335-9. PubMed ID: 19457736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Hemodynamic monitoring with the lithium dilution cardiac output system].
    Christiansen C; Hostrup A; Tønnesen E; Krogh EH
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Feb; 170(7):522-4. PubMed ID: 18291079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery.
    Breukers RM; Sepehrkhouy S; Spiegelenberg SR; Groeneveld AB
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Oct; 21(5):632-5. PubMed ID: 17905265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Impedance cardiography: a potential monitor for hemodialysis.
    Wynne JL; Ovadje LO; Akridge CM; Sheppard SW; Vogel RL; Van de Water JM
    J Surg Res; 2006 Jun; 133(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 16631198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of continuous arterial pressure waveform analysis with the lithium dilution technique to monitor cardiac output in conscious dogs with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
    Duffy AL; Butler AL; Radecki SV; Campbell VL
    Am J Vet Res; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1365-73. PubMed ID: 19878019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Critical care of the burn patient: the first 48 hours.
    Latenser BA
    Crit Care Med; 2009 Oct; 37(10):2819-26. PubMed ID: 19707133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The evolution and current use of invasive hemodynamic monitoring for predicting volume responsiveness during resuscitation, perioperative, and critical care.
    Manoach S; Weingart SD; Charchaflieh J
    J Clin Anesth; 2012 May; 24(3):242-50. PubMed ID: 22537573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [National experts consensus on application of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technique in severe burn treatment (2018 version)].
    ; Zhang WY; Wang W
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2018 Nov; 34(11):776-781. PubMed ID: 30481917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The inability of emergency physicians to adequately clinically estimate the underlying hemodynamic profiles of acutely ill patients.
    Nowak RM; Sen A; Garcia AJ; Wilkie H; Yang JJ; Nowak MR; Moyer ML
    Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Jul; 30(6):954-60. PubMed ID: 21802880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Hemodynamic changes associated with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severe preeclampsia.
    Dyer RA; Piercy JL; Reed AR; Lombard CJ; Schoeman LK; James MF
    Anesthesiology; 2008 May; 108(5):802-11. PubMed ID: 18431115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A dynamic view of dynamic indices.
    Fischer MO; Guinot PG; Biais M; Mahjoub Y; Mallat J; Lorne E;
    Minerva Anestesiol; 2016 Oct; 82(10):1115-1121. PubMed ID: 27407021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Minimally invasive beat-by-beat monitoring of cardiac power in normal hearts and during acute ventricular dysfunction.
    Rimehaug AE; Skogvoll E; Aadahl P; Lyng O; Nordhaug DO; Løvstakken L; Kirkeby-Garstad I
    Physiol Rep; 2016 Oct; 4(19):. PubMed ID: 27702881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Using arterial pressure waveform analysis for the assessment of fluid responsiveness.
    Cannesson M; de Backer D; Hofer CK
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2011 Sep; 8(5):635-46. PubMed ID: 22026628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Exploring hemodynamics: a review of current and emerging noninvasive monitoring techniques.
    Johnson A; Mohajer-Esfahani M
    Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 2014 Sep; 26(3):357-75. PubMed ID: 25169689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Application of pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technique in hemodynamic monitoring in critical patients].
    Fang H; Zheng X; Xia Z
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2014 Aug; 30(4):328-30. PubMed ID: 25429813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Minimally- and non-invasive assessment of maternal cardiac output: go with the flow!
    Armstrong S; Fernando R; Columb M
    Int J Obstet Anesth; 2011 Oct; 20(4):330-40. PubMed ID: 21925868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Assessment of stress-induced hemodynamic responses using multipurpose non-invasive continuous cardiovascular monitoring system.
    Nogawa M; Yamakoshi T; Ikarashi A; Tanaka S; Yamakoshi K
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; Suppl():6537-9. PubMed ID: 17959446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.