These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21131179)

  • 1. Biomechanical effect of crestal bone osteoplasty before implant placement: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Hudieb M; Kasugai S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 40(2):200-6. PubMed ID: 21131179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
    Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants.
    Ding X; Liao SH; Zhu XH; Zhang XH; Zhang L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 18783411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
    Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical evaluation of the consolidation period of alveolar distraction osteogenesis with three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Veziroglu F; Yilmaz D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 May; 37(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 18272343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implant biomechanics in grafted sinus: a finite element analysis.
    Fanuscu MI; Vu HV; Poncelet B
    J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(2):59-68. PubMed ID: 15119454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finite element stress analysis of edentulous mandibles with different bone types supporting multiple-implant superstructures.
    de Almeida EO; Rocha EP; Freitas AC; Freitas MM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(6):1108-14. PubMed ID: 21197486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting time-dependent remodeling of bone around immediately loaded dental implants with different designs.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jan; 32(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 19884034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ten years of experience with the anterior maxillary and mandibular osteoplasty (class IV ridges): a retrospective analysis of implant survival rates.
    Laverick S; Summerwill A; Cawood JI
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 May; 37(5):415-8. PubMed ID: 18308512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants.
    Teixeira MF; Ramalho SA; de Mattias Sartori IA; Lehmann RB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20147815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis.
    Petrie CS; Williams JL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 16117775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of crestal bone for augmentation of extremely knife-edged alveolar ridges prior to implant placement: report of 3 cases.
    Bernhart T; Weber R; Mailath G; Ulm C; Dörtbudak O; Watzek G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(3):424-7. PubMed ID: 10379117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.