These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21131392)

  • 1. The effect of drill-free and drilling methods on the stability of mini-implants under early orthodontic loading in adolescent patients.
    Türköz C; Ataç MS; Tuncer C; Balos Tuncer B; Kaan E
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Oct; 33(5):533-6. PubMed ID: 21131392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels.
    Chatzigianni A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 21062964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Moon CH; Park HK; Nam JS; Im JS; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 20620833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical observations and success rates of palatal implants.
    Asscherickx K; Vannet BV; Bottenberg P; Wehrbein H; Sabzevar MM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 20122439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading.
    Kim SH; Cho JH; Chung KR; Kook YA; Nelson G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18617101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan.
    Wu TY; Kuang SH; Wu CH
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1595-9. PubMed ID: 19615569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of orthodontic mini-implants in adolescents.
    Motoyoshi M; Matsuoka M; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Aug; 36(8):695-9. PubMed ID: 17521887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthodontic mini-implant stability in different healing times before loading: a microscopic computerized tomographic and biomechanical analysis.
    Zhao L; Xu Z; Yang Z; Wei X; Tang T; Zhao Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 19615659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The application of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.
    Tseng YC; Hsieh CH; Chen CH; Shen YS; Huang IY; Chen CM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Aug; 35(8):704-7. PubMed ID: 16690253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unusual extraction treatment in Class II division 1 using C-orthodontic mini-implants.
    Chung KR; Cho JH; Kim SH; Kook YA; Cozzani M
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):155-66. PubMed ID: 17029536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of stability between delayed versus immediately loaded orthodontic palatal implants.
    Jackson A; Lemke R; Hatch J; Salome N; Gakunga P; Cochran D
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 18533979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and histologic analysis of the stability of microimplants with immediate orthodontic loading in dogs.
    Chen Y; Kang ST; Bae SM; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 19651357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the loading behavior of self-drilling and predrilled miniscrews throughout orthodontic loading.
    Wang YC; Liou EJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 18174069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs.
    Chen Y; Shin HI; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18174070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival analysis of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Lee SJ; Ahn SJ; Lee JW; Kim SH; Kim TW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 20152674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of self-tapping and self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants: an animal study of insertion torque and displacement under lateral loading.
    Su YY; Wilmes B; Hönscheid R; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):404-11. PubMed ID: 19587861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems.
    Chen YJ; Chang HH; Huang CY; Hung HC; Lai EH; Yao CC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):768-75. PubMed ID: 17868386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictors of initial stability of orthodontic miniscrew implants.
    Lim HJ; Choi YJ; Evans CA; Hwang HS
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Oct; 33(5):528-32. PubMed ID: 21228119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone-to-implant contact of orthodontic implants in humans--a histomorphometric investigation.
    Jung BA; Yildizhan F; Wehrbein H
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):552-7. PubMed ID: 19054812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 21458232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.