231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21131496)
1. Staphylococcus aureus ClpC divergently regulates capsule via sae and codY in strain newman but activates capsule via codY in strain UAMS-1 and in strain Newman with repaired saeS.
Luong TT; Sau K; Roux C; Sau S; Dunman PM; Lee CY
J Bacteriol; 2011 Feb; 193(3):686-94. PubMed ID: 21131496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nutritional Regulation of the Sae Two-Component System by CodY in Staphylococcus aureus.
Mlynek KD; Sause WE; Moormeier DE; Sadykov MR; Hill KR; Torres VJ; Bayles KW; Brinsmade SR
J Bacteriol; 2018 Apr; 200(8):. PubMed ID: 29378891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. MsaB and CodY Interact To Regulate Staphylococcus aureus Capsule in a Nutrient-Dependent Manner.
Batte JL; Sahukhal GS; Elasri MO
J Bacteriol; 2018 Sep; 200(17):. PubMed ID: 29941424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Trapping and identification of cellular substrates of the Staphylococcus aureus ClpC chaperone.
Graham JW; Lei MG; Lee CY
J Bacteriol; 2013 Oct; 195(19):4506-16. PubMed ID: 23913326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MgrA activates expression of capsule genes, but not the α-toxin gene in experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.
Gupta RK; Alba J; Xiong YQ; Bayer AS; Lee CY
J Infect Dis; 2013 Dec; 208(11):1841-8. PubMed ID: 23901087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Repression of Capsule Production by XdrA and CodY in Staphylococcus aureus.
Lei MG; Lee CY
J Bacteriol; 2018 Sep; 200(18):. PubMed ID: 29967117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CodY in Staphylococcus aureus: a regulatory link between metabolism and virulence gene expression.
Pohl K; Francois P; Stenz L; Schlink F; Geiger T; Herbert S; Goerke C; Schrenzel J; Wolz C
J Bacteriol; 2009 May; 191(9):2953-63. PubMed ID: 19251851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The mcsB gene of the clpC operon is required for stress tolerance and virulence in Staphylococcus aureus.
Wozniak DJ; Tiwari KB; Soufan R; Jayaswal RK
Microbiology (Reading); 2012 Oct; 158(Pt 10):2568-2576. PubMed ID: 22902728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. RbsR Activates Capsule but Represses the rbsUDK Operon in Staphylococcus aureus.
Lei MG; Lee CY
J Bacteriol; 2015 Dec; 197(23):3666-75. PubMed ID: 26350136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CodY-mediated regulation of the Staphylococcus aureus Agr system integrates nutritional and population density signals.
Roux A; Todd DA; Velázquez JV; Cech NB; Sonenshein AL
J Bacteriol; 2014 Mar; 196(6):1184-96. PubMed ID: 24391052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regulation of the Sae Two-Component System by Branched-Chain Fatty Acids in Staphylococcus aureus.
Pendleton A; Yeo WS; Alqahtani S; DiMaggio DA; Stone CJ; Li Z; Singh VK; Montgomery CP; Bae T; Brinsmade SR
mBio; 2022 Oct; 13(5):e0147222. PubMed ID: 36135382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential target gene activation by the Staphylococcus aureus two-component system saeRS.
Mainiero M; Goerke C; Geiger T; Gonser C; Herbert S; Wolz C
J Bacteriol; 2010 Feb; 192(3):613-23. PubMed ID: 19933357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A point mutation in the sensor histidine kinase SaeS of Staphylococcus aureus strain Newman alters the response to biocide exposure.
Schäfer D; Lâm TT; Geiger T; Mainiero M; Engelmann S; Hussain M; Bosserhoff A; Frosch M; Bischoff M; Wolz C; Reidl J; Sinha B
J Bacteriol; 2009 Dec; 191(23):7306-14. PubMed ID: 19783632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The SaeRS Two-Component System Is a Direct and Dominant Transcriptional Activator of Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin 1 in Staphylococcus aureus.
Baroja ML; Herfst CA; Kasper KJ; Xu SX; Gillett DA; Li J; Reid G; McCormick JK
J Bacteriol; 2016 Oct; 198(19):2732-42. PubMed ID: 27457715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Staphylococcus aureus CodY negatively regulates virulence gene expression.
Majerczyk CD; Sadykov MR; Luong TT; Lee C; Somerville GA; Sonenshein AL
J Bacteriol; 2008 Apr; 190(7):2257-65. PubMed ID: 18156263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repair of global regulators in Staphylococcus aureus 8325 and comparative analysis with other clinical isolates.
Herbert S; Ziebandt AK; Ohlsen K; Schäfer T; Hecker M; Albrecht D; Novick R; Götz F
Infect Immun; 2010 Jun; 78(6):2877-89. PubMed ID: 20212089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SaeRS-dependent inhibition of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus Newman.
Cue D; Junecko JM; Lei MG; Blevins JS; Smeltzer MS; Lee CY
PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123027. PubMed ID: 25853849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. saeRS and sarA act synergistically to repress protease production and promote biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus.
Mrak LN; Zielinska AK; Beenken KE; Mrak IN; Atwood DN; Griffin LM; Lee CY; Smeltzer MS
PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e38453. PubMed ID: 22685571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Guanine Limitation Results in CodY-Dependent and -Independent Alteration of Staphylococcus aureus Physiology and Gene Expression.
King AN; Borkar SA; Samuels DJ; Batz Z; Bulock LL; Sadykov MR; Bayles KW; Brinsmade SR
J Bacteriol; 2018 Jul; 200(14):. PubMed ID: 29712876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stochastic Expression of Sae-Dependent Virulence Genes during Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Development Is Dependent on SaeS.
DelMain EA; Moormeier DE; Endres JL; Hodges RE; Sadykov MR; Horswill AR; Bayles KW
mBio; 2020 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 31937649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
