These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Priming of Pop-out provides reliable measures of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. Lamy D; Antebi C; Aviani N; Carmel T Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 18054983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fortune and reversals of fortune in visual search: Reward contingencies for pop-out targets affect search efficiency and target repetition effects. Kristjánsson A; Sigurjónsdóttir O; Driver J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1229-36. PubMed ID: 20601703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Permeability of priming of pop out to expectations. Pascucci D; Mastropasqua T; Turatto M J Vis; 2012 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 23024358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does. Lamy D; Yashar A Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Attention orienting and the time course of perceptual decisions: response time distributions with masked and unmasked displays. Smith PL; Ratcliff R; Wolfgang BJ Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1297-320. PubMed ID: 15066392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Priming of pop-out on multiple time scales during visual search. Brascamp JW; Pels E; Kristjánsson A Vision Res; 2011 Sep; 51(17):1972-8. PubMed ID: 21782839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Visual search and dual tasks reveal two distinct attentional resources. VanRullen R; Reddy L; Koch C J Cogn Neurosci; 2004; 16(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 15006031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Refining the dual-stage account of intertrial feature priming: does motor response or response feature matter? Yashar A; Lamy D Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2160-7. PubMed ID: 21769533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Inhibitory tagging in an interrupted visual search. Thomas LE; Lleras A Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Aug; 71(6):1241-50. PubMed ID: 19633340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A switch in task affects priming of pop-out: evidence for the role of episodes. Thomson DR; Milliken B Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):318-33. PubMed ID: 21264719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Wolfe JM; Butcher SJ; Lee C; Hyle M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Apr; 29(2):483-502. PubMed ID: 12760630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search. Becker SI J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):247-65. PubMed ID: 20438251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Task-set reconfiguration suspends perceptual processing: evidence from semantic priming during the attentional blink. Vachon F; Tremblay S; Jones DM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Apr; 33(2):330-47. PubMed ID: 17469971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Functional topography of working memory for face or voice identity. Rämä P; Courtney SM Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(1):224-34. PubMed ID: 15588614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]