217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21132369)
1. Nucleus pulposus cell response to confined and unconfined compression implicates mechanoregulation by fluid shear stress.
Wang P; Yang L; Hsieh AH
Ann Biomed Eng; 2011 Mar; 39(3):1101-11. PubMed ID: 21132369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of experimental protocols on the mechanical properties of the intervertebral disc in unconfined compression.
Recuerda M; Coté SP; Villemure I; Périé D
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Jul; 133(7):071006. PubMed ID: 21823745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biologic response of the intervertebral disc to static and dynamic compression in vitro.
Wang DL; Jiang SD; Dai LY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2521-8. PubMed ID: 17978649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Static compression induces zonal-specific changes in gene expression for extracellular matrix and cytoskeletal proteins in intervertebral disc cells in vitro.
Chen J; Yan W; Setton LA
Matrix Biol; 2004 Jan; 22(7):573-83. PubMed ID: 14996437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of the mechanical behavior of chondrocytes in unconfined compression tests for cyclic loading.
Wu JZ; Herzog W
J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):603-16. PubMed ID: 16439231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose-dependent response of tissue-engineered intervertebral discs to dynamic unconfined compressive loading.
Hudson KD; Mozia RI; Bonassar LJ
Tissue Eng Part A; 2015 Feb; 21(3-4):564-72. PubMed ID: 25277703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calibration of hyperelastic material properties of the human lumbar intervertebral disc under fast dynamic compressive loads.
Wagnac E; Arnoux PJ; Garo A; El-Rich M; Aubin CE
J Biomech Eng; 2011 Oct; 133(10):101007. PubMed ID: 22070332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Growth plate explants respond differently to in vitro static and dynamic loadings.
Sergerie K; Parent S; Beauchemin PF; Londoño I; Moldovan F; Villemure I
J Orthop Res; 2011 Apr; 29(4):473-80. PubMed ID: 21337387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contribution of tissue composition and structure to mechanical response of articular cartilage under different loading geometries and strain rates.
Julkunen P; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2010 Apr; 9(2):237-45. PubMed ID: 19680701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tissue engineering of cartilage using a mechanobioreactor exerting simultaneous mechanical shear and compression to simulate the rolling action of articular joints.
Shahin K; Doran PM
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2012 Apr; 109(4):1060-73. PubMed ID: 22095592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A one-dimensional theoretical prediction of the effect of reduced end-plate permeability on the mechanics of the intervertebral disc.
Riches PE; McNally DS
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 Sep; 219(5):329-35. PubMed ID: 16225149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional inhomogeneous triphasic finite-element analysis of physical signals and solute transport in human intervertebral disc under axial compression.
Yao H; Gu WY
J Biomech; 2007; 40(9):2071-7. PubMed ID: 17125776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanobiology of the intervertebral disc and relevance to disc degeneration.
Setton LA; Chen J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Apr; 88 Suppl 2():52-7. PubMed ID: 16595444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of creep on human lumbar intervertebral disk impact mechanics.
Jamison D; Marcolongo MS
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Mar; 136(3):031006. PubMed ID: 24292391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Role of load history in intervertebral disc mechanics and intradiscal pressure generation.
Hwang D; Gabai AS; Yu M; Yew AG; Hsieh AH
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2012 Jan; 11(1-2):95-106. PubMed ID: 21380846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biological response of the intervertebral disc to dynamic loading.
Walsh AJ; Lotz JC
J Biomech; 2004 Mar; 37(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 14757452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic Compression Effects on Immature Nucleus Pulposus: a Study Using a Novel Intelligent and Mechanically Active Bioreactor.
Li P; Gan Y; Wang H; Zhang C; Wang L; Xu Y; Song L; Li S; Li S; Ou Y; Zhou Q
Int J Med Sci; 2016; 13(3):225-34. PubMed ID: 26941583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A finite element model predicts the mechanotransduction response of tendon cells to cyclic tensile loading.
Lavagnino M; Arnoczky SP; Kepich E; Caballero O; Haut RC
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2008 Oct; 7(5):405-16. PubMed ID: 17901992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The establishment of a mechanobiology model of bone and functional adaptation in response to mechanical loading.
Chen XY; Zhang XZ; Guo Y; Li RX; Lin JJ; Wei Y
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008; 23 Suppl 1():S88-95. PubMed ID: 18448217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human cells derived from degenerate intervertebral discs respond differently to those derived from non-degenerate intervertebral discs following application of dynamic hydrostatic pressure.
Le Maitre CL; Frain J; Fotheringham AP; Freemont AJ; Hoyland JA
Biorheology; 2008; 45(5):563-75. PubMed ID: 19065005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
