These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21133789)

  • 21. A review of community-based participatory research: a promising approach to address depression among Latinos?
    Stacciarini JM
    Issues Ment Health Nurs; 2009 Dec; 30(12):751-7. PubMed ID: 19916809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Research Ethics Committees and Participatory Action Research With Young People: The Politics of Voice.
    Yanar ZM; Fazli M; Rahman J; Farthing R
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2016 Apr; 11(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 27241872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Common (mis)perceptions about IRB review of human subjects research.
    Lynn MR; Nelson DK
    Nurs Sci Q; 2005 Jul; 18(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 15976051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics.
    Garrard E; Dawson A
    J Med Ethics; 2005 Jul; 31(7):419-23. PubMed ID: 15994364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Introduction to special issue: advancing the ethics of community-based participatory research.
    Shore N; Wong KA; Seifer SD; Grignon J; Gamble VN
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2008 Jun; 3(2):1-4. PubMed ID: 19385741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ethics creep or governance creep? Challenges for Australian Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECS).
    Gorman SM
    Monash Bioeth Rev; 2011 Sep; 29(4):14.1-16. PubMed ID: 22397089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Interpretations of interpretations: combining community-based participatory research and interpretive inquiry to improve health.
    Gregg J; Centurion L; Maldonado J; Aguillon R; Celaya-Alston R; Farquhar S
    Prog Community Health Partnersh; 2010; 4(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 20543490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [A welcome guide for evaluating medical research involving human subjects].
    Borst-Eilers E
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 May; 147(19):898-900. PubMed ID: 12768802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The institutional review board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation.
    Edgar H; Rothman DJ
    Milbank Q; 1995; 73(4):489-506. PubMed ID: 7491097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of community health advisors in community-based participatory research.
    Story L; Hinton A; Wyatt SB
    Nurs Ethics; 2010 Jan; 17(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 20089631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A vision for progress in community health partnerships.
    Tandon SD; Phillips K; Bordeaux BC; Bone L; Brown PB; Cagney KA; Gary TL; Kim M; Levine DM; Price E; Sydnor KD; Stone K; Bass EB
    Prog Community Health Partnersh; 2007; 1(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 20208271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Medical research oversight from the corporate governance perspective: comparing institutional review boards and corporate boards.
    Saver RS
    William Mary Law Rev; 2004 Nov; 46(2):619-730. PubMed ID: 17167924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Health researchers' views of ethics committee functioning in New Zealand.
    Paul C
    N Z Med J; 2000 Jun; 113(1111):210-4. PubMed ID: 10909934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ethical Challenges in Community-Based Participatory Research: A Scoping Review.
    Wilson E; Kenny A; Dickson-Swift V
    Qual Health Res; 2018 Jan; 28(2):189-199. PubMed ID: 29235941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Human subject protections in the United States: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks.
    Russell-Einhorn M; Ellis GB
    J Biolaw Bus; 1998; 1(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 12739540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Educational advantage.
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2009 Jun; 4(2):77-9. PubMed ID: 19480595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Tobacco industry research and protection of human subjects: a case study of R. J. Reynolds.
    White J; Parascandola M; Bero L
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2007 Nov; 9(11):1213-25. PubMed ID: 17978997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Resources employed by health researchers to ensure ethical research practice.
    Guillemin M; Gillam L; Rosenthal D; Bolitho A
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2010 Jun; 5(2):21-34. PubMed ID: 20569147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. CBPR in Indian country: tensions and implications for health communication.
    Peterson JC
    Health Commun; 2010 Jan; 25(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 20390670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Nine key functions for a human subjects protection program for community-engaged research: points to consider.
    Ross LF; Loup A; Nelson RM; Botkin JR; Kost R; Smith GR; Gehlert S
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2010 Mar; 5(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 20235862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.