BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21133836)

  • 1. Bioelectric effects of intense ultrashort pulses.
    Joshi RP; Schoenbach KH
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2010; 38(3):255-304. PubMed ID: 21133836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subcellular effects of nanosecond electrical pulses.
    Schoenbach KH; Joshi R; Kolb J; Buescher S; Beebe S
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2004; 2004():5447-50. PubMed ID: 17271579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling environment for numerical simulation of applied electric fields on biological cells.
    Suzuki DO; Ramos A; Marques JL
    Electromagn Biol Med; 2007; 26(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 17886010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of intense submicrosecond electrical pulses on cells.
    Deng J; Schoenbach KH; Buescher ES; Hair PS; Fox PM; Beebe SJ
    Biophys J; 2003 Apr; 84(4):2709-14. PubMed ID: 12668479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numerical modeling of in vivo plate electroporation thermal dose assessment.
    Becker SM; Kuznetsov AV
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Feb; 128(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 16532620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulations of transient membrane behavior in cells subjected to a high-intensity ultrashort electric pulse.
    Hu Q; Viswanadham S; Joshi RP; Schoenbach KH; Beebe SJ; Blackmore PF
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2005 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):031914. PubMed ID: 15903466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nanosecond pulsed electric field generators for the study of subcellular effects.
    Kolb JF; Kono S; Schoenbach KH
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 Apr; 27(3):172-87. PubMed ID: 16304697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling electroporation in a single cell.
    Krassowska W; Filev PD
    Biophys J; 2007 Jan; 92(2):404-17. PubMed ID: 17056739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Nanoelectropulse-driven membrane perturbation and small molecule permeabilization.
    Vernier PT; Sun Y; Gundersen MA
    BMC Cell Biol; 2006 Oct; 7():37. PubMed ID: 17052354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-lasting plasma membrane permeabilization in mammalian cells by nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF).
    Pakhomov AG; Kolb JF; White JA; Joshi RP; Xiao S; Schoenbach KH
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2007 Dec; 28(8):655-63. PubMed ID: 17654532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bipolar nanosecond electric pulses are less efficient at electropermeabilization and killing cells than monopolar pulses.
    Ibey BL; Ullery JC; Pakhomova ON; Roth CC; Semenov I; Beier HT; Tarango M; Xiao S; Schoenbach KH; Pakhomov AG
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2014 Jan; 443(2):568-73. PubMed ID: 24332942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intracellular electroporation site distributions: modeling examples for nsPEF and IRE pulse waveforms.
    Gowrishankar TR; Esser AT; Smith KC; Son RS; Weaver JC
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():732-5. PubMed ID: 22254414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Membrane electroporation: The absolute rate equation and nanosecond time scale pore creation.
    Vasilkoski Z; Esser AT; Gowrishankar TR; Weaver JC
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2006 Aug; 74(2 Pt 1):021904. PubMed ID: 17025469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Study on time-frequency characteristics of cellular transmenbrane potentials based on equivalent circuit model.
    Yao C; Hu X; Li C; Mi Y; Sun C
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():1032-5. PubMed ID: 19162838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Leukemic cell intracellular responses to nanosecond electric fields.
    Chen N; Schoenbach KH; Kolb JF; James Swanson R; Garner AL; Yang J; Joshi RP; Beebe SJ
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2004 Apr; 317(2):421-7. PubMed ID: 15063775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High electrical field effects on cell membranes.
    Pliquett U; Joshi RP; Sridhara V; Schoenbach KH
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2007 May; 70(2):275-82. PubMed ID: 17123870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multiple nanosecond electric pulses increase the number but not the size of long-lived nanopores in the cell membrane.
    Pakhomov AG; Gianulis E; Vernier PT; Semenov I; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2015 Apr; 1848(4):958-66. PubMed ID: 25585279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental characterization and numerical modeling of tissue electrical conductivity during pulsed electric fields for irreversible electroporation treatment planning.
    Neal RE; Garcia PA; Robertson JL; Davalos RV
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Apr; 59(4):1076-85. PubMed ID: 22231669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Plasma membrane voltage changes during nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure.
    Frey W; White JA; Price RO; Blackmore PF; Joshi RP; Nuccitelli R; Beebe SJ; Schoenbach KH; Kolb JF
    Biophys J; 2006 May; 90(10):3608-15. PubMed ID: 16513782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of electrostimulation and electroporation by high repetition rate bursts of nanosecond stimuli.
    Sözer EB; Pakhomov AG; Semenov I; Casciola M; Kim V; Vernier PT; Zemlin CW
    Bioelectrochemistry; 2021 Aug; 140():107811. PubMed ID: 33862549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.