1046 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21134891)
1. Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models.
Benkert P; Biasini M; Schwede T
Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 27(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 21134891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. QMEAN server for protein model quality estimation.
Benkert P; Künzli M; Schwede T
Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 Jul; 37(Web Server issue):W510-4. PubMed ID: 19429685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Global and local model quality estimation at CASP8 using the scoring functions QMEAN and QMEANclust.
Benkert P; Tosatto SC; Schwede T
Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():173-80. PubMed ID: 19705484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information.
Benkert P; Schwede T; Tosatto SC
BMC Struct Biol; 2009 May; 9():35. PubMed ID: 19457232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. QMEANDisCo-distance constraints applied on model quality estimation.
Studer G; Rempfer C; Waterhouse AM; Gumienny R; Haas J; Schwede T
Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1765-1771. PubMed ID: 31697312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment.
Benkert P; Tosatto SC; Schomburg D
Proteins; 2008 Apr; 71(1):261-77. PubMed ID: 17932912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Deviations from standard atomic volumes as a quality measure for protein crystal structures.
Pontius J; Richelle J; Wodak SJ
J Mol Biol; 1996 Nov; 264(1):121-36. PubMed ID: 8950272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of different functions for predicted protein model quality assessment.
Li J; Fang H
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Jul; 30(7):553-8. PubMed ID: 27488386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MetaMQAP: a meta-server for the quality assessment of protein models.
Pawlowski M; Gajda MJ; Matlak R; Bujnicki JM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 9():403. PubMed ID: 18823532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ranking predicted protein structures with support vector regression.
Qiu J; Sheffler W; Baker D; Noble WS
Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1175-82. PubMed ID: 18004754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of protein model structure accuracy estimation in CASP13: Challenges in the era of deep learning.
Won J; Baek M; Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Seok C
Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1351-1360. PubMed ID: 31436360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gaia: automated quality assessment of protein structure models.
Kota P; Ding F; Ramachandran S; Dokholyan NV
Bioinformatics; 2011 Aug; 27(16):2209-15. PubMed ID: 21700672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia.
Bhattacharya A; Tejero R; Montelione GT
Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 17186527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction.
Zhang Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():40. PubMed ID: 18215316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Absolute quality evaluation of protein model structures using statistical potentials with respect to the native and reference states.
Shirota M; Ishida T; Kinoshita K
Proteins; 2011 May; 79(5):1550-63. PubMed ID: 21365682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the absolute quality of a single protein model using structural features and support vector machines.
Wang Z; Tegge AN; Cheng J
Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):638-47. PubMed ID: 19004001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ProTSAV: A protein tertiary structure analysis and validation server.
Singh A; Kaushik R; Mishra A; Shanker A; Jayaram B
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2016 Jan; 1864(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 26478257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multivariate Analyses of Quality Metrics for Crystal Structures in the PDB Archive.
Shao C; Yang H; Westbrook JD; Young JY; Zardecki C; Burley SK
Structure; 2017 Mar; 25(3):458-468. PubMed ID: 28216043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protein secondary structure prediction with SPARROW.
Bettella F; Rasinski D; Knapp EW
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Feb; 52(2):545-56. PubMed ID: 22224407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calibrating E-values for hidden Markov models using reverse-sequence null models.
Karplus K; Karchin R; Shackelford G; Hughey R
Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4107-15. PubMed ID: 16123115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
