These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1070 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21134891)

  • 1. Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models.
    Benkert P; Biasini M; Schwede T
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 27(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 21134891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. QMEAN server for protein model quality estimation.
    Benkert P; Künzli M; Schwede T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 Jul; 37(Web Server issue):W510-4. PubMed ID: 19429685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Global and local model quality estimation at CASP8 using the scoring functions QMEAN and QMEANclust.
    Benkert P; Tosatto SC; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2009; 77 Suppl 9():173-80. PubMed ID: 19705484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. QMEANclust: estimation of protein model quality by combining a composite scoring function with structural density information.
    Benkert P; Schwede T; Tosatto SC
    BMC Struct Biol; 2009 May; 9():35. PubMed ID: 19457232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. QMEANDisCo-distance constraints applied on model quality estimation.
    Studer G; Rempfer C; Waterhouse AM; Gumienny R; Haas J; Schwede T
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 36(6):1765-1771. PubMed ID: 31697312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment.
    Benkert P; Tosatto SC; Schomburg D
    Proteins; 2008 Apr; 71(1):261-77. PubMed ID: 17932912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deviations from standard atomic volumes as a quality measure for protein crystal structures.
    Pontius J; Richelle J; Wodak SJ
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Nov; 264(1):121-36. PubMed ID: 8950272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of different functions for predicted protein model quality assessment.
    Li J; Fang H
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2016 Jul; 30(7):553-8. PubMed ID: 27488386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MetaMQAP: a meta-server for the quality assessment of protein models.
    Pawlowski M; Gajda MJ; Matlak R; Bujnicki JM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 9():403. PubMed ID: 18823532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ranking predicted protein structures with support vector regression.
    Qiu J; Sheffler W; Baker D; Noble WS
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1175-82. PubMed ID: 18004754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of protein model structure accuracy estimation in CASP13: Challenges in the era of deep learning.
    Won J; Baek M; Monastyrskyy B; Kryshtafovych A; Seok C
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1351-1360. PubMed ID: 31436360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gaia: automated quality assessment of protein structure models.
    Kota P; Ding F; Ramachandran S; Dokholyan NV
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Aug; 27(16):2209-15. PubMed ID: 21700672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia.
    Bhattacharya A; Tejero R; Montelione GT
    Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 17186527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction.
    Zhang Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 9():40. PubMed ID: 18215316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absolute quality evaluation of protein model structures using statistical potentials with respect to the native and reference states.
    Shirota M; Ishida T; Kinoshita K
    Proteins; 2011 May; 79(5):1550-63. PubMed ID: 21365682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the absolute quality of a single protein model using structural features and support vector machines.
    Wang Z; Tegge AN; Cheng J
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(3):638-47. PubMed ID: 19004001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ProTSAV: A protein tertiary structure analysis and validation server.
    Singh A; Kaushik R; Mishra A; Shanker A; Jayaram B
    Biochim Biophys Acta; 2016 Jan; 1864(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 26478257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multivariate Analyses of Quality Metrics for Crystal Structures in the PDB Archive.
    Shao C; Yang H; Westbrook JD; Young JY; Zardecki C; Burley SK
    Structure; 2017 Mar; 25(3):458-468. PubMed ID: 28216043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protein secondary structure prediction with SPARROW.
    Bettella F; Rasinski D; Knapp EW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Feb; 52(2):545-56. PubMed ID: 22224407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calibrating E-values for hidden Markov models using reverse-sequence null models.
    Karplus K; Karchin R; Shackelford G; Hughey R
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Nov; 21(22):4107-15. PubMed ID: 16123115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 54.