These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Early experience with robotic navigation for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Kautzner J; Peichl P; Cihák R; Wichterle D; Mlcochová H Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2009 Mar; 32 Suppl 1():S163-6. PubMed ID: 19250085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Study design of the man and machine trial: a prospective international controlled noninferiority trial comparing manual with robotic catheter ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Rillig A; Schmidt B; Steven D; Meyerfeldt U; DI Biase L; Wissner E; Becker R; Thomas D; Wohlmuth P; Gallinghouse GJ; Scholz E; Jung W; Willems S; Natale A; Ouyang F; Kuck KH; Tilz R J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 23131063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic catheter navigation within the left ventricle. Duncan E; Johns N; Schilling RJ; Sporton S Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2011 Nov; 34(11):102-4. PubMed ID: 20663076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Atrial fibrillation ablation using a robotic catheter remote control system: initial human experience and long-term follow-up results. Saliba W; Reddy VY; Wazni O; Cummings JE; Burkhardt JD; Haissaguerre M; Kautzner J; Peichl P; Neuzil P; Schibgilla V; Noelker G; Brachmann J; Di Biase L; Barrett C; Jais P; Natale A J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Jun; 51(25):2407-11. PubMed ID: 18565397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using remote magnetic catheter navigation: a case-control study. Arya A; Zaker-Shahrak R; Sommer P; Bollmann A; Wetzel U; Gaspar T; Richter S; Husser D; Piorkowski C; Hindricks G Europace; 2011 Jan; 13(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 21149511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Novel robotic catheter manipulation system integrated with remote magnetic navigation for fully remote ablation of atrial tachyarrhythmias: a two-centre evaluation. Nölker G; Gutleben KJ; Muntean B; Vogt J; Horstkotte D; Dabiri Abkenari L; Akca F; Szili-Torok T Europace; 2012 Dec; 14(12):1715-8. PubMed ID: 22719063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for ablation of supraventricular tachycardias: a randomized, multicenter trial. Wood MA; Orlov M; Ramaswamy K; Haffajee C; Ellenbogen K; Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Oct; 31(10):1313-21. PubMed ID: 18811813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Remote magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation: is 'As Good as Manual' good enough. Burkhardt JD; Di Biase L; Natale A Europace; 2011 Jan; 13(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 21045013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the safety and feasibility of arrhythmia ablation using the Amigo Robotic Remote Catheter System versus manual ablation. Datino T; Arenal A; Pelliza M; Hernández-Hernández J; Atienza F; González-Torrecilla E; Avila P; Bravo L; Fernández-Avilés F Am J Cardiol; 2014 Mar; 113(5):827-31. PubMed ID: 24440330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of remote magnetic catheter navigation on ablation fluoroscopy and procedure time. Kim AM; Turakhia M; Lu J; Badhwar N; Lee BK; Lee RJ; Marcus GM; Tseng ZH; Scheinman M; Olgin JE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1399-404. PubMed ID: 18950296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility and safety of remote-controlled magnetic navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Katsiyiannis WT; Melby DP; Matelski JL; Ervin VL; Laverence KL; Gornick CC Am J Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 102(12):1674-6. PubMed ID: 19064022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic magnetic navigation for ablation of human arrhythmias: initial experience. Latcu DG; Ricard P; Zarqane N; Yaici K; Rinaldi JP; Maluski A; Saoudi N Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2009 May; 102(5):419-25. PubMed ID: 19520327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Worldwide experience with the robotic navigation system in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: methodology, efficacy and safety. Bai R; DI Biase L; Valderrabano M; Lorgat F; Mlcochova H; Tilz R; Meyerfeldt U; Hranitzky PM; Wazni O; Kanagaratnam P; Doshi RN; Gibson D; Pisapia A; Mohanty P; Saliba W; Ouyang F; Kautzner J; Gallinghouse GJ; Natale A J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2012 Aug; 23(8):820-6. PubMed ID: 22509886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Remote vs. conventional navigation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: insights from prospective registry data. van den Bruck JH; Sultan A; Lüker J; Thomas D; Willems S; Weinmann K; Kuniss M; Hochadel M; Senges J; Andresen D; Brachmann J; Kuck KH; Tilz R; Steven D Clin Res Cardiol; 2019 Mar; 108(3):298-308. PubMed ID: 30159751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new minimally invasive heart surgery instrument for atrial fibrillation treatment: first in vitro and animal tests. Abadie J; Faure A; Chaillet N; Rougeot P; Beaufort D; Goldstein JP; Finlay PA; Bogaerts G Int J Med Robot; 2006 Jun; 2(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 17520630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Remote magnetic navigation to map and ablate left coronary cusp ventricular tachycardia. Burkhardt JD; Saliba WI; Schweikert RA; Cummings J; Natale A J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Oct; 17(10):1142-4. PubMed ID: 16879625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ablation of atrial fibrillation utilizing robotic catheter navigation in comparison to manual navigation and ablation: single-center experience. Di Biase L; Wang Y; Horton R; Gallinghouse GJ; Mohanty P; Sanchez J; Patel D; Dare M; Canby R; Price LD; Zagrodzky JD; Bailey S; Burkhardt JD; Natale A J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1328-35. PubMed ID: 19656244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]