142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21135834)
21. More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 - a new record.
Van Noorden R
Nature; 2023 Dec; 624(7992):479-481. PubMed ID: 38087103
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author.
Smith R
BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7511):288-91. PubMed ID: 16052023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Correcting the scientific record.
Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Jul; 4(7):381. PubMed ID: 18560424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Scientific misconduct. Online sleuths challenge Cell paper.
Xin H
Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5806):1669. PubMed ID: 17170263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Departmental and institutional strategies for reducing fraud in clinical research.
Sessler DI; Kurz A
Anesth Analg; 2012 Aug; 115(2):474-6. PubMed ID: 22826524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Cognition research. Investigation leaves field in the dark about a colleague's work.
Miller G
Science; 2010 Aug; 329(5994):890-1. PubMed ID: 20724607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Misconduct in scientific publications.
Glina S
Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2012; 10(4):vii-viii. PubMed ID: 23386100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Retractions' realities.
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The aftermath of scientific fraud.
Bonetta L
Cell; 2006 Mar; 124(5):873-5. PubMed ID: 16530031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Retraction and the "de-discovery" of XMRV.
Lancet Infect Dis; 2012 Nov; 12(11):817. PubMed ID: 23099070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Scientific misconduct. Retractions put spotlight on China's part-time professor system.
Xin H
Science; 2009 Mar; 323(5919):1280-1. PubMed ID: 19264995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Can we trust your data?
Moore S
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2011 Nov; 38(6):615. PubMed ID: 22037323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Cervical Cancer Inquiry.
Baird T
N Z Med J; 2004 Oct; 117(1204):U1136. PubMed ID: 15505677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. On the scientific misconduct: a letter from Russia.
Jargin S
Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2013; 11(1):135. PubMed ID: 23579761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Mistakes and misconduct in the research literature: retractions just the tip of the iceberg.
Poulton A
Med J Aust; 2007 Mar; 186(6):323-4. PubMed ID: 17371220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The changing face of scientific misconduct.
Bevan D
Clin Invest Med; 2004 Jun; 27(3):117-9. PubMed ID: 15305801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Retractions: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
Wager E; Barbour V; Yentis S; Kleinert S;
Obes Rev; 2010 Jan; 11(1):64-6. PubMed ID: 20653849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Foibles and peccadillos in the research environment.
Elwood TW
J Allied Health; 2012; 41(4):147. PubMed ID: 23224279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Letter to the editor: retraction and coauthorship in problematic publication.
Wiwanitkit S; Wiwanitkit V
Account Res; 2015; 22(2):120-1. PubMed ID: 25397602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. [Plagiarism is the emerged part of scientific misconduct].
Maisonneuve H
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2013 Jan; 32(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23246179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
