260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21138778)
1. Selecting optimal monitoring site locations for peak ambient particulate material concentrations using the MM5-CAMx4 numerical modelling system.
Sturman A; Titov M; Zawar-Reza P
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Jan; 409(4):810-21. PubMed ID: 21138778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improvement of predicted fine and total particulate matter (PM) composition by applying several different chemical scenarios: a winter 2005 case study.
Titov M; Sturman A; Zawar-Reza P
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Oct; 385(1-3):284-96. PubMed ID: 17662372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomagnetic monitoring of industry-derived particulate pollution.
Hansard R; Maher BA; Kinnersley R
Environ Pollut; 2011 Jun; 159(6):1673-81. PubMed ID: 21450382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial and temporal variability in urban fine particulate matter concentrations.
Levy JI; Hanna SR
Environ Pollut; 2011; 159(8-9):2009-15. PubMed ID: 21144634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Particulate matter and carbon monoxide multiple regression models using environmental characteristics in a high diesel-use area of Baguio City, Philippines.
Cassidy BE; Alabanza-Akers MA; Akers TA; Hall DB; Ryan PB; Bayer CW; Naeher LP
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Aug; 381(1-3):47-58. PubMed ID: 17481696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Particle size distribution of ambient aerosols in an industrial area.
Rao BP; Srivastava A; Yasmin F; Ray S; Gupta N; Chauhan C; Rao CV; Wate SR
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2012 May; 88(5):717-21. PubMed ID: 22307732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Overview of the Brooklyn traffic real-time ambient pollutant penetration and environmental dispersion (B-TRAPPED) study: theoretical background and model for design of field experiments.
Hahn I; Wiener RW; Richmond-Bryant J; Brixey LA; Henkle SW
J Environ Monit; 2009 Dec; 11(12):2115-21. PubMed ID: 20024008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new approach for combining information available from multiple particulate air pollution monitors.
Roberts S; Martin M
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 18(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 17684530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A statistical assessment of saturation and mobile sampling strategies to estimate long-term average concentrations across urban areas.
Xu X; Brook JR; Guo Y
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2007 Nov; 57(11):1396-406. PubMed ID: 18069463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Source apportionment of population representative samples of PM(2.5) in three European cities using structural equation modelling.
Ilacqua V; Hänninen O; Saarela K; Katsouyanni K; Künzli N; Jantunen M
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Oct; 384(1-3):77-92. PubMed ID: 17628634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Seasonal trends of PM2.5 and PM10 in ambient air and their correlation in ambient air of Lucknow city, India.
Pandey P; Khan AH; Verma AK; Singh KA; Mathur N; Kisku GC; Barman SC
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2012 Feb; 88(2):265-70. PubMed ID: 22105933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multidimensional modeling of aerosol monitoring data.
Astel A; Simeonov V; Bauer H; Puxbaum H
Environ Pollut; 2010 Oct; 158(10):3201-8. PubMed ID: 20692747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pollution situation and possible markers of different sources in the Ordos Region, Inner Mongolia, China.
Zhang W; Wang W; Chen J; Liu H; Dai T; Yang XY; Zhang F; Lin J; Wang Z
Sci Total Environ; 2010 Jan; 408(3):624-35. PubMed ID: 19914684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The influence of improved air quality on mortality risks in Erfurt, Germany.
Peters A; Breitner S; Cyrys J; Stölzel M; Pitz M; Wölke G; Heinrich J; Kreyling W; Küchenhoff H; Wichmann HE
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 Feb; (137):5-77; discussion 79-90. PubMed ID: 19554968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of particulate matter pollution in the Pearl River Delta region, China: an observational-based analysis of two monitoring sites.
Peng G; Wang X; Wu Z; Wang Z; Yang L; Zhong L; Chen D
J Environ Monit; 2011 Jul; 13(7):1927-34. PubMed ID: 21614393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a multiple regression model for the forecasting of the concentrations of NOx and PM10 in Athens and Helsinki.
Vlachogianni A; Kassomenos P; Karppinen A; Karakitsios S; Kukkonen J
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Mar; 409(8):1559-71. PubMed ID: 21277004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Brooklyn traffic real-time ambient pollutant penetration and environmental dispersion (B-TRAPPED) field study methodology.
Richmond-Bryant J; Hahn I; Fortune CR; Rodes CE; Portzer JW; Lee S; Wiener RW; Smith LA; Wheeler M; Seagraves J; Stein M; Eisner AD; Brixey LA; Drake-Richman ZE; Brouwer LH; Ellenson WD; Baldauf R
J Environ Monit; 2009 Dec; 11(12):2122-35. PubMed ID: 20024009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An overview of the PM10 pollution problem, in the Metropolitan Area of Athens, Greece. Assessment of controlling factors and potential impact of long range transport.
Grivas G; Chaloulakou A; Kassomenos P
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Jan; 389(1):165-77. PubMed ID: 17900663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intercomparison of air quality data using principal component analysis, and forecasting of PM₁₀ and PM₂.₅ concentrations using artificial neural networks, in Thessaloniki and Helsinki.
Voukantsis D; Karatzas K; Kukkonen J; Räsänen T; Karppinen A; Kolehmainen M
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Mar; 409(7):1266-76. PubMed ID: 21276603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]