702 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21139507)
1. Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk italian 1 study): final results.
Sardanelli F; Podo F; Santoro F; Manoukian S; Bergonzi S; Trecate G; Vergnaghi D; Federico M; Cortesi L; Corcione S; Morassut S; Di Maggio C; Cilotti A; Martincich L; Calabrese M; Zuiani C; Preda L; Bonanni B; Carbonaro LA; Contegiacomo A; Panizza P; Di Cesare E; Savarese A; Crecco M; Turchetti D; Tonutti M; Belli P; Maschio AD;
Invest Radiol; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 21139507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results.
Sardanelli F; Podo F; D'Agnolo G; Verdecchia A; Santaquilani M; Musumeci R; Trecate G; Manoukian S; Morassut S; de Giacomi C; Federico M; Cortesi L; Corcione S; Cirillo S; Marra V; ; Cilotti A; Di Maggio C; Fausto A; Preda L; Zuiani C; Contegiacomo A; Orlacchio A; Calabrese M; Bonomo L; Di Cesare E; Tonutti M; Panizza P; Del Maschio A
Radiology; 2007 Mar; 242(3):698-715. PubMed ID: 17244718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surveillance of Women with the BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation by Using Biannual Automated Breast US, MR Imaging, and Mammography.
van Zelst JCM; Mus RDM; Woldringh G; Rutten MJCM; Bult P; Vreemann S; de Jong M; Karssemeijer N; Hoogerbrugge N; Mann RM
Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):376-388. PubMed ID: 28609204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.
Kuhl CK; Schrading S; Leutner CC; Morakkabati-Spitz N; Wardelmann E; Fimmers R; Kuhn W; Schild HH
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Nov; 23(33):8469-76. PubMed ID: 16293877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.
Warner E; Plewes DB; Hill KA; Causer PA; Zubovits JT; Jong RA; Cutrara MR; DeBoer G; Yaffe MJ; Messner SJ; Meschino WS; Piron CA; Narod SA
JAMA; 2004 Sep; 292(11):1317-25. PubMed ID: 15367553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Besnard PE; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Peterse H; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Muller SH; Meijer S; Oosterwijk JC; Beex LV; Tollenaar RA; de Koning HJ; Rutgers EJ; Klijn JG;
N Engl J Med; 2004 Jul; 351(5):427-37. PubMed ID: 15282350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).
Leach MO; Boggis CR; Dixon AK; Easton DF; Eeles RA; Evans DG; Gilbert FJ; Griebsch I; Hoff RJ; Kessar P; Lakhani SR; Moss SM; Nerurkar A; Padhani AR; Pointon LJ; Thompson D; Warren RM;
Lancet; 2005 May 21-27; 365(9473):1769-78. PubMed ID: 15910949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective multicenter cohort study to refine management recommendations for women at elevated familial risk of breast cancer: the EVA trial.
Kuhl C; Weigel S; Schrading S; Arand B; Bieling H; König R; Tombach B; Leutner C; Rieber-Brambs A; Nordhoff D; Heindel W; Reiser M; Schild HH
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Mar; 28(9):1450-7. PubMed ID: 20177029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study.
Lehman CD; Isaacs C; Schnall MD; Pisano ED; Ascher SM; Weatherall PT; Bluemke DA; Bowen DJ; Marcom PK; Armstrong DK; Domchek SM; Tomlinson G; Skates SJ; Gatsonis C
Radiology; 2007 Aug; 244(2):381-8. PubMed ID: 17641362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer.
Warner E; Plewes DB; Shumak RS; Catzavelos GC; Di Prospero LS; Yaffe MJ; Goel V; Ramsay E; Chart PL; Cole DE; Taylor GA; Cutrara M; Samuels TH; Murphy JP; Murphy JM; Narod SA
J Clin Oncol; 2001 Aug; 19(15):3524-31. PubMed ID: 11481359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with an inherited risk for breast cancer.
Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Obdeijn IM; Boetes C; Zonderland HM; Muller SH; Kok T; Manoliu RA; Besnard AP; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Seynaeve C; Bartels CC; Kaas R; Meijer S; Oosterwijk JC; Hoogerbrugge N; Tollenaar RA; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Nov; 100(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 16791481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density.
Riedl CC; Luft N; Bernhart C; Weber M; Bernathova M; Tea MK; Rudas M; Singer CF; Helbich TH
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1128-35. PubMed ID: 25713430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should we screen BRCA1 mutation carriers only with MRI? A multicenter study.
Obdeijn IM; Winter-Warnars GA; Mann RM; Hooning MJ; Hunink MG; Tilanus-Linthorst MM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Apr; 144(3):577-82. PubMed ID: 24567197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of alternating mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for screening women with deleterious BRCA mutations at high risk of breast cancer.
Le-Petross HT; Whitman GJ; Atchley DP; Yuan Y; Gutierrez-Barrera A; Hortobagyi GN; Litton JK; Arun BK
Cancer; 2011 Sep; 117(17):3900-7. PubMed ID: 21365619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.
Vreemann S; van Zelst JCM; Schlooz-Vries M; Bult P; Hoogerbrugge N; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Aug; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30075794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness of screening women with familial risk for breast cancer with magnetic resonance imaging.
Saadatmand S; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Rutgers EJ; Hoogerbrugge N; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RA; Hooning M; Loo CE; Obdeijn IM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Sep; 105(17):1314-21. PubMed ID: 23940285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of screening with annual magnetic resonance imaging and mammography: results of the initial screen from the ontario high risk breast screening program.
Chiarelli AM; Prummel MV; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Horgan M; Carroll JC; Eisen A; Meschino WS; Shumak RS; Warner E; Rabeneck L
J Clin Oncol; 2014 Jul; 32(21):2224-30. PubMed ID: 24934793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI and mammography surveillance of women at increased risk for breast cancer: recommendations using an evidence-based approach.
Granader EJ; Dwamena B; Carlos RC
Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1590-5. PubMed ID: 19000876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences between first and subsequent rounds of the MRISC breast cancer screening program for women with a familial or genetic predisposition.
Kriege M; Brekelmans CT; Boetes C; Muller SH; Zonderland HM; Obdeijn IM; Manoliu RA; Kok T; Rutgers EJ; de Koning HJ; Klijn JG;
Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2318-26. PubMed ID: 16615112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
