These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2114124)

  • 1. Nonocclusive, clean permanent right atrial catheter dressing change procedures compared with occlusive, sterile permanent right atrial catheter dressing change procedures in children with cancer.
    Hutchinson SK; Waskerwitz M; Martin K; Faubion W; Revesz S
    J Pediatr Oncol Nurs; 1990 Apr; 7(2):71. PubMed ID: 2114124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved long-term maintenance of central venous catheters with a new dressing technique.
    Eisenberg PG; Howard MP; Gianino MS
    J Intraven Nurs; 1990; 13(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 2401932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of dressing materials on central venous catheter infection rates.
    Treston-Aurand J; Olmsted RN; Allen-Bridson K; Craig CP
    J Intraven Nurs; 1997; 20(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 9281961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of different central venous line dressing techniques on microorganism growth in a pediatric oncology population.
    Freiberger D; Bryant J; Mareno B
    J Pediatr Oncol Nurs; 1991 Apr; 8(2):76. PubMed ID: 1675080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of occlusive dressings on central venous catheter sites in hospitalized children.
    Taylor D; Myers ST; Monarch K; Leon C; Hall J; Sibley Y
    J Pediatr Nurs; 1996 Jun; 11(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 8667154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changing central venous catheter lines: evaluation of a modification to clinical practice.
    Robertson J
    J Pediatr Oncol Nurs; 1991 Oct; 8(4):173-9. PubMed ID: 1930810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transparent and gauze dressings and their effect on infection rates of central venous catheters: a review of past and current literature.
    Lau CE
    J Intraven Nurs; 1996; 19(5):240-5. PubMed ID: 9060348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of transparent adherent and dry sterile gauze dressings for long-term central catheters in patients undergoing bone marrow transplant.
    Shivnan JC; McGuire D; Freedman S; Sharkazy E; Bosserman G; Larson E; Grouleff P
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1991; 18(8):1349-56. PubMed ID: 1762975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison and cost-effectiveness analysis of peripheral catheter dressings.
    Salles FT; Santos VL; Secoli SR; Aron S; Debbio CB; Baptista CC; Rogenski NM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2007 Sep; 53(9):26-33. PubMed ID: 17893427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of central venous catheter dressings in bone marrow transplant recipients.
    Brandt B; DePalma J; Irwin M; Shogan J; Lucke JF
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1996 Jun; 23(5):829-36. PubMed ID: 8792352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Avoiding an unnecessary outcome. A comparative trial between IV3000 and a conventional film dressing to assess rates of catheter-related sepsis.
    Keenlyside D
    Prof Nurse; 1993 Feb; 8(5):288-91. PubMed ID: 8451247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Central line dressings: study of infection rates.
    Lucas H; Attard-Montalto S
    Paediatr Nurs; 1996 Jul; 8(6):21-3. PubMed ID: 8718254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dressing a central venous catheter a better way.
    Howard MP; Eisenberg PG; Gianino MS
    Nursing; 1992 Mar; 22(3):60-1. PubMed ID: 1553093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diabetic foot ulcerations. A controlled, randomized comparison of two moist wound healing protocols: Carrasyn Hydrogel Wound dressing and wet-to-moist saline gauze.
    Jensen JL; Seeley J; Gillin B
    Adv Wound Care; 1998; 11(7 Suppl):1-4. PubMed ID: 10326334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of a new hydrocolloid occlusive dressing for central catheters used in total parenteral nutrition.
    Haffejee AA; Moodley J; Pillay K; Singh B; Thomson S; Bhamjee A
    S Afr J Surg; 1991 Dec; 29(4):142-6. PubMed ID: 1763392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Care of the central venous catheterization site: the use of a transparent polyurethane film.
    Vazquez RM; Jarrard MM
    JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr; 1984; 8(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 6425522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do dressings with increased permeability reduce the incidence of central venous catheter related sepsis?
    Reynolds MG; Tebbs SE; Elliott TS
    Intensive Crit Care Nurs; 1997 Feb; 13(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 9095879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Once- versus twice-weekly changing of central venous catheter occlusive dressing in intensive chemotherapy patients: results of a randomized multicenter study.
    Vokurka S; Bystricka E; Visokaiova M; Scudlova J
    Med Sci Monit; 2009 Mar; 15(3):CR107-10. PubMed ID: 19247240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A look at wound dressings.
    Turner TD
    Health Soc Serv J; 1979 May; 89(4640):529-31. PubMed ID: 10316824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressing versus conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds.
    Singh A; Halder S; Menon GR; Chumber S; Misra MC; Sharma LK; Srivastava A
    Asian J Surg; 2004 Oct; 27(4):326-32. PubMed ID: 15564189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.